Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27083451›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2016

Retrorectal Tumors: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Seong Kyu Baek, Grace Soon Hwang, Alessio Vinci, Mehraneh D Jafari, Fariba Jafari, Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Alessio Pigazzi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Robotic resection of presacral tumors.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024
    Article
  18. Presacral tumors: A systematic review of literature.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2024
    Review
  19. Laparoscopic resection of a retrorectal cystic tumor.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Seong Kyu BaekKeimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Grace Soon HwangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard, West Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Alessio VinciDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard, West Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Mehraneh D JafariDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard, West Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Fariba JafariDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard, West Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Zhobin MoghadamyeghanehDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard, West Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Alessio PigazziDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard, West Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA. apigazzi@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine Medical Center · USColor (United States) · USKeimyung College University · KRUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceRetrorectal tumors are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histologic types. Reports are limited to small single-institution case series, and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking.

objectiveThe purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathologic subtypes, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes of retrorectal tumors. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We conducted a review of the literature using PubMed and searched the reference lists of published studies.

resultsA total of 341 studies comprising 1708 patients were included. Overall, 68 % of patients were female. The mean age was 44.6 ± 13.7 years. Of all patients, 1194 (70 %) had benign lesions, and 514 patients (30 %) had malignant tumors. Congenital tumors (60.5 %) were the most frequent histologic type. Other pathologic types were neurogenic tumors (14.8 %), osseous tumors (3.1 %), inflammatory tumors (2.6 %), and miscellaneous tumors (19.1 %). Biopsy was performed in 27 % of the patients. Of these patients, incorrect diagnoses occurred in 44 %. An anterior surgical approach (AA) was performed in 299 patients (35 %); a posterior approach (PA) was performed in 443 (52 %), and a combined approach (CA) was performed in 119 patients (14 %). The mean length of stay (LOS) of PA was 7 ± 5 days compared to 8 ± 7 days for AA and 11 ± 7 days for CA (p < 0.05). The overall morbidity rate was 13.2 %: 19.3 % associated with anterior approach, 7.2 % associated with posterior approach, and 24.7 % after a combined approach (p < 0.05). Overall postoperative recurrence rate was 21.6 %; 6.7 % after an anterior approach, 26.6 % after a posterior approach, and 28.6 % after a combined approach (p < 0.05). A minimally invasive approach (MIS) was employed in 83 patients. MIS provided shorter hospital stays than open surgery (4 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 7 days; p < 0.05). Differences in complication rate were 19.8 % in MIS and 12.2 % in open surgery and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Retrorectal tumors are most commonly benign in etiology, of a congenital nature, and have a female predominance. Complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of retrorectal tumor management. A minimal access surgery approach, when feasible, appears to be a safe option for the management of retrorectal tumors, with shorter operative time and length of stay.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27083451
OpenAlexW2340521581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.