ReviewWorld journal of surgery2016
Retrorectal Tumors: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Review in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Pooled it
- Modified Kraske Procedure for retrorectal tumors: Early postoperative outcomes and surgical site infection rates in a single-center experience.BMC surgery · 2026Observational
- Retrorectal tumors over 25 years: Surgical strategies and long-term outcomes from a high-volume tertiary center.Medicine · 2026Article
- Retrorectal cystic hamartoma unmasked by coccygeal fracture: a case report and review of presacral tailgut cysts and surgical management.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Bilateral presacral tumors in an adult female patient: A case report and literature review.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Combined Laparoscopic and Posterior Approach Resection of Presacral Neuroblastoma with Rectobulbar Urethral Fistula.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Surgical Outcomes of Retrorectal Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 12 Years' Experience.World journal of plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Presacral tumors: a retrospective analysis of 112 cases with emphasis on diagnostic challenges and surgical outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic approach in the surgical treatment of large retrorectal tumors: a short-term experience at a single tertiary center case series in Korea.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2024Article
- Risk factors for long-term urination and sexual function impairment following laparoscopic resection of presacral lesions.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The management of retrorectal tumors - a single-center analysis of 21 cases and overview of the literature.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Review
- A rare case of benign retrorectal teratoma in an adult female: Diagnostic challenges and successful surgical management.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Minimally invasive approach for retrorectal tumors above and below S3: a multicentric tertiary center retrospective study (MiaRT study).Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Analysis of the clinicopathological features of tailgut cyst with emphasis on the development of neoplastic lesions.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Robotic resection of presacral tumors.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Presacral tumors: A systematic review of literature.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2024Review
- Laparoscopic resection of a retrorectal cystic tumor.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery technique: an acceptable approach for retrorectal tumors.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceRetrorectal tumors are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histologic types. Reports are limited to small single-institution case series, and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking.
objectiveThe purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathologic subtypes, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes of retrorectal tumors. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We conducted a review of the literature using PubMed and searched the reference lists of published studies.
resultsA total of 341 studies comprising 1708 patients were included. Overall, 68 % of patients were female. The mean age was 44.6 ± 13.7 years. Of all patients, 1194 (70 %) had benign lesions, and 514 patients (30 %) had malignant tumors. Congenital tumors (60.5 %) were the most frequent histologic type. Other pathologic types were neurogenic tumors (14.8 %), osseous tumors (3.1 %), inflammatory tumors (2.6 %), and miscellaneous tumors (19.1 %). Biopsy was performed in 27 % of the patients. Of these patients, incorrect diagnoses occurred in 44 %. An anterior surgical approach (AA) was performed in 299 patients (35 %); a posterior approach (PA) was performed in 443 (52 %), and a combined approach (CA) was performed in 119 patients (14 %). The mean length of stay (LOS) of PA was 7 ± 5 days compared to 8 ± 7 days for AA and 11 ± 7 days for CA (p < 0.05). The overall morbidity rate was 13.2 %: 19.3 % associated with anterior approach, 7.2 % associated with posterior approach, and 24.7 % after a combined approach (p < 0.05). Overall postoperative recurrence rate was 21.6 %; 6.7 % after an anterior approach, 26.6 % after a posterior approach, and 28.6 % after a combined approach (p < 0.05). A minimally invasive approach (MIS) was employed in 83 patients. MIS provided shorter hospital stays than open surgery (4 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 7 days; p < 0.05). Differences in complication rate were 19.8 % in MIS and 12.2 % in open surgery and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Retrorectal tumors are most commonly benign in etiology, of a congenital nature, and have a female predominance. Complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of retrorectal tumor management. A minimal access surgery approach, when feasible, appears to be a safe option for the management of retrorectal tumors, with shorter operative time and length of stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.