Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27083443›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Skin toxicity and quality of life during treatment with panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma: results from three randomised clinical trials.

Reija Koukakis, Francesca Gatta, Guy Hechmati, Salvatore Siena

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Navigating metastatic colorectal treatment options in the USA: a survey of patient acceptance of skin toxicities associated with Vectibix.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Reija KoukakisBiostatistics, Amgen Ltd, 1 Uxbridge Business Park, Sanderson Road, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 1DH, UK. reijak@amgen.com.
Francesca GattaGlobal Health Economics, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.
Guy HechmatiGlobal Health Economics, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.
Salvatore SienaNiguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHAmgen (United Kingdom) · GBAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEpidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors such as panitumumab are associated with characteristic skin toxicities. We summarise data from three panitumumab clinical trials to investigate the potential impact of skin toxicity on quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

methodsThe studies were randomised, open-label trials comparing standard treatment (first-line FOLFOX4 [n = 456], second-line FOLFIRI [n = 381], or best supportive care [n = 114]) with or without panitumumab in adults with KRAS/NRAS (RAS) wild-type mCRC. QoL was assessed using the EuroQoL 5-domain health state index (HSI) and overall health rating (OHR) measures. Impact of skin toxicity on changes in QoL scores was estimated using a linear mixed-effects model. Worst skin toxicity was defined in separate models as a subgroup variable or as a measure over time.

resultsRegardless of analysis method, there were no statistically significant differences between the panitumumab and comparator arms in any of the studies in terms of change in HSI or OHR scores. There were no statistically significant differences in QoL outcomes between patients with worst skin toxicity grade <3 and those with grade ≥3. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences between the panitumumab and comparator arms in subgroups of patients with worst skin toxicity of grade <3 and ≥3.

conclusionsAddition of panitumumab to chemotherapy in RAS wild-type mCRC has no statistically significant negative effect on overall QoL, despite skin toxicity. Skin toxicity of worst grade ≥3 appeared to have similar impact on QoL as skin toxicity of grade <3.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPanitumumabQuality of LifeSkin DiseasesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsPanitumumabColorectal cancerEpidermal growth factor receptor inhibitorsPanitumumabQuality of lifeSkin toxicity

Identifiers

PMID27083443
PMCPMC5010834
OpenAlexW2340784104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.