Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27083420›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN

Perceptions of Electronic Cigarettes Among Medicaid-Eligible Pregnant and Postpartum Women.

Amanda Fallin, Alana Miller, Sara Assef, Kristin Ashford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Vaping in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Regional Rural-Urban Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Reasons for Use in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pilot Tobacco Treatment Intervention for Women in Residential Treatment for Substance Use Disorder.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Patterns of Single and Multiple Tobacco Product Use Among US Women of Reproductive Age.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda Fallin
Alana Miller
Sara Assef
Kristin Ashford

Funding

The impact of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) on perinatal immune responsiveness and birth outcomes in AppalachiaR01DA040694 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ASHFORD, KRISTIN H. · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe perceptions and beliefs about electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use during pregnancy among pregnant and newly postpartum women.

designAn exploratory, qualitative descriptive study.

settingUniversity-affiliated prenatal clinics.

participantsTwelve pregnant or recently postpartum women who reported use of tobacco and electronic cigarettes.

methodsSemistructured focus groups were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. The transcripts were coded to consensus and analyzed with MAXQDA software (version 11) using content analysis.

resultsFour overarching themes emerged: (a) Attraction to E-Cigarettes as a Harm Reduction Strategy, (b) Uncertainty Regarding the Health Effects of E-Cigarettes; (c) Ambivalence Regarding Novel Product Characteristics; and (d) Behaviors Reflected Dual Use and Often Complete Relapse to Traditional Cigarettes.

conclusionPregnant women are initially attracted to e-cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy, but they often return to traditional cigarettes in the postpartum period. Nurses should counsel pregnant women on the adverse effects of fetal exposure to nicotine. Evidence-based nursing interventions are needed to prevent relapse during the postpartum period.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsMedicaidAdultEvidence-Based NursingFemaleHumansNicotinePostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnant PeopleUnited StatesNicotineelectronic cigarettesqualitative researchtobacco use

Identifiers

PMID27083420
PMCPMC6749137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.