Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27083114›Full record

ReviewUrologic oncology2016

Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Mark D Tyson, Sandeep S Arora, Kristen R Scarpato, Daniel Barocas

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019
    Review
  4. Diagnosis of prostate cancer.Asian journal of urology · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
  6. La Radiologia medica · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark D TysonDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: mark.tyson@vanderbilt.edu.
Sandeep S AroraDepartment of Radiology and Radiologic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Kristen R ScarpatoDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Daniel BarocasDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Surgical Oncology Training GrantT32CA106183 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Richard Goldenring · 2004 to 2026
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA106183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has ushered in a new era for urologists who perform prostate needle biopsies. The fusion of MRI with transrectal ultrasound (US) allows the direct targeting of suspicious lesions, which has been shown to improve the performance of conventional random biopsy techniques by increasing detection of clinically relevant disease while also decreasing detection of low-risk cancer. However, as with any new technology, many questions regarding effectiveness, reproducibility, and generalizability still remain. In this review, we (1) provide a summary of the various sequences that comprise a MRI of the prostate; (2) evaluate the 3 different ways of incorporating MRI into targeted biopsies of the prostate including in-bore MRI-guided biopsy, cognitive fusion, and device-mediated fusion; (3) review the sensitivity of MR-US fusion in the detection of clinically significant and clinically insignificant disease; and (4) review the barriers to the widespread implementation of MR-US fusion into everyday practice. Whereas other articles in this issue of Urologic Oncology Seminars will discuss other aspects of MRI in the management of prostate cancer, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of MR-US fusion biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsFusionMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstate BiopsyProstate CancerUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID27083114
PMCPMC4912896
OpenAlexW2339029272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.