Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27082564›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Prolonged Drainage and Intrapericardial Bleomycin Administration for Cardiac Tamponade Secondary to Cancer-Related Pericardial Effusion.

Gianmauro Numico, Antonella Cristofano, Marcella Occelli, Marco Sicuro, Alessandro Mozzicafreddo, Elena Fea, Ida Colantonio, Marco Merlano, Pierluigi Piovano, Nicola Silvestris

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Pericardial Disease Associated with Malignancy.Current cardiology reports · 2018
    Review
  9. The value of the new scoring system for predicting neoplastic pericarditis in the patients with large pericardial effusion.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gianmauro NumicoFrom the Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e C Arrigo, Alessandria (GN, PP); Medical Oncology and Hematology (AC, AM) and Cardiology (MS), Azienda USL della Valle d'Aosta, Aosta; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (MO, EF, IC, MM); and Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari (NS), Italy.
Antonella Cristofano
Marcella Occelli
Marco Sicuro
Alessandro Mozzicafreddo
Elena Fea
Ida Colantonio
Marco Merlano
Pierluigi Piovano
Nicola Silvestris
University of Aosta Valley · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication of several cancers. The most commonly involved solid tumors are lung and breast cancer. MPE can give rise to the clinical picture of cardiac tamponade, a life threatening condition that needs immediate drainage. While simple pericardiocentesis allows resolution of the symptoms, MPE frequently relapses unless further procedures are performed. Prolonged drainage, talcage with antineoplastic agents, or surgical creation of a pleuro-pericardial window are the most commonly suggested ones. They all result in MPE resolution and high rates of long-term control. Patients suitable for further systemic treatments can have a good prognosis irrespective of the pericardial site of disease. We prospectively enrolled patients with cardiac tamponade treated with prolonged drainage associated with Bleomycin administration. Twenty-two consecutive patients with MPE and associated signs of hemodynamical compromise underwent prolonged drainage and subsequent Bleomycin administration. After injection of 100 mg lidocaine hydrochloride, 10 mg Bleomycin was injected into the pericardial space. The catheter was clumped for 48 h and then reopened. Removal was performed when the drainage volume was <25 mL daily. Twelve patients (54%) achieved complete response and 9 (41%) a partial response. Only 1 (5%) had a treatment failure and underwent a successful surgical procedure. Acute toxicity was of a low degree and occurred in 7 patients (32%). It consisted mainly in thoracic pain and supraventricular arrhythmia. The 1-year pericardial effusion progression-free survival rate was 74.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.0-97.3). At a median follow-up of 75 months, a pericardial progression was detected in 4 patients (18%). One- and two-year overall survival rates were 33.9% (95% CI: 13.6-54.2) and 14.5% (95% CI: 0.0-29.5), respectively, with lung cancer patients having a shorter survival than breast cancer patients. The worst prognosis, however, was shown in patients not suitable for systemic treatments, irrespective of the site of the primary tumor.Prolonged drainage and intrapericardial Bleomycin is a safe and effective treatment, which should be considered as first choice at least in patients suitable for active systemic treatment.

Indexed as

BleomycinBreast NeoplasmsCardiac TamponadeDrainageLung NeoplasmsPericardial EffusionPericardiumPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Administration RoutesFemaleHumansItalyMaleAntineoplastic AgentsBleomycin

Identifiers

PMID27082564
PMCPMC4839808
OpenAlexW2346241304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.