Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27082562›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2016

Combination of Two Targeted Medications (Bevacizumab Plus Cetuximab) Improve the Therapeutic Response of Pancreatic Carcinoma.

Cheng-Jeng Tai, Ming-Te Huang, Chih-Hsiung Wu, Chien-Kai Wang, Chen-Jei Tai, Chun-Chao Chang, Cheng-I Hsieh, Yu-Jia Chang, Chang-Jer Wu, Li-Jen Kuo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Recent advances in drug delivery and targeting for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Advances and Prospects in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Cheng-Jeng TaiFrom the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital (C-JT, C-KW, C-CC, C-IH); Department of Internal Medicine (C-JT, C-KW, C-IH); Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University (M-TH, L-JK, P-LW, RJC); Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital (M-TH, C-HW); Center of Excellence for Cancer Research, Taipei Medical University (C-HW); Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (C-HW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University (C-KW, C-JT); Department of Chinese Medicine (C-KW, C-JT); Traditional Herbal Medicine Research Center (C-KW, C-JT); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine (C-CC); Cancer Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital (Y-JC); Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University (Y-JC, L-JK, P-LW); Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei (Y-JC, L-JK, P-LW, R-JC); Department of Food Science (C-JW); Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung (C-JW); Program for Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University (P-LW); and School of Public Health, College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (H-YC).
Ming-Te Huang
Chih-Hsiung Wu
Chien-Kai Wang
Chen-Jei Tai
Chun-Chao Chang
Cheng-I Hsieh
Yu-Jia Chang
Chang-Jer Wu
Li-Jen Kuo
Po-Lei Wei
Ray-Jade Chen
Hung-Yi Chiou
National Taiwan Ocean University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of the targeted medications, bevacizumab and cetuximab, in combination with cytostatic drugs in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In this retrospective phase 2 study, a total of 59 patients with pancreatic cancer were recruited and received conventional (gemcitabine, cisplatin, and fluorouracil) or targeted regimen (conventional plus bevacizumab and cetuximab for the first cycle) in 2-week intervals for four cycles. The primary end-point for this study was the overall response rate. Secondary end-points were progression-free survival and the safety profiles of the combined therapy. The median time-to-progression and overall survival were 3 and 7 months, respectively, in the conventional treatment group as well as 11 and 13 months, respectively, in the targeted medications treatment group. The most common adverse events in both treatment groups were nausea and vomiting. Moderate (Grade 2) nausea and vomiting were more common in the conventional group than the targeted group but severe (Grade 3) nausea and vomiting were more common in the targeted group. Bevacizumab and cetuximab in combination with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and fluorouracil may help lengthen overall survival up to six months for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCetuximabDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesVomitingBevacizumabCetuximab

Identifiers

PMID27082562
PMCPMC4839806
OpenAlexW2340049292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.