Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27082543›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Predicting Noninsulin Antidiabetic Drug Adherence Using a Theoretical Framework Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Study.

Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Jocelyne Moisan, Sophie Lauzier, Laurence Guillaumie, Jean-Pierre Grégoire, Line Guénette

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The study of eye care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hervé Tchala Vignon ZomahounFrom the Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada (HTVZ, JM, SL, J-PG, Line Guénette); Chair on Adherence to Treatments (HTVZ, JM, SL, Line Guénette, J-PG, Laurence Guillaumie); Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre (HTVZ, JM, SL, , Line Guénette, J-PG, Laurence Guillaumie); and Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada (Laurence Guillaumie).
Jocelyne Moisan
Sophie Lauzier
Laurence Guillaumie
Jean-Pierre Grégoire
Line Guénette
SNC-Lavalin (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the process behind noninsulin antidiabetic drug (NIAD) nonadherence is necessary for designing effective interventions to resolve this problem. This study aimed to explore the ability of the theory of planned behavior (TPB), which is known as a good predictor of behaviors, to predict the future NIAD adherence in adults with type 2 diabetes. We conducted a prospective study of adults with type 2 diabetes. They completed a questionnaire on TPB variables and external variables. Linear regression was used to explore the TPB's ability to predict future NIAD adherence, which was prospectively measured as the proportion of days covered by at least 1 NIAD using pharmacy claims data. The interaction between past NIAD adherence and intention was tested. The sample included 340 people. There was an interaction between past NIAD adherence and intention to adhere to the NIAD (P = 0.032). Intention did not predict future NIAD adherence in the past adherers and nonadherers groups, but its association measure was high among past nonadherers (β = 5.686, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.174, 21.546). In contrast, intention was mainly predicted by perceived behavioral control both in the past adherers (β = 0.900, 95% CI 0.796, 1.004) and nonadherers groups (β = 0.760, 95% CI 0.555, 0.966). The present study suggests that TPB is a good tool to predict intention to adhere and future NIAD adherence. However, there was a gap between intention to adhere and actual adherence to the NIAD, which is partly explained by the past adherence level in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

IntentionAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalProspective StudiesSocial SupportSocioeconomic FactorsHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27082543
PMCPMC4839786
OpenAlexW2342131394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.