Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081843›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2016

Urinary microRNA-based signature improves accuracy of detection of clinically relevant prostate cancer within the prostate-specific antigen grey zone.

Alberto Ivan Salido-Guadarrama, Jorge Gustavo Morales-Montor, Claudia Rangel-Escareño, Elizabeth Langley, Oscar Peralta-Zaragoza, Jose Luis Cruz Colin, Mauricio Rodriguez-Dorantes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Urinary MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Urological Cancers: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Urinary microRNAs expression in prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Urinary miRNAs: Technical Updates.MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto Ivan Salido-GuadarramaOncogenomics Laboratory, The National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City 14610, Mexico.
Jorge Gustavo Morales-MontorUrology Department, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Claudia Rangel-EscareñoComputational Genomics, The National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City 14610, Mexico.
Elizabeth LangleyDepartment of Basic Research, National Institute of Cancerology, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Oscar Peralta-ZaragozaDivision of Chronic Infections and Cancer, Research Center in Infection Diseases, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico.
Jose Luis Cruz ColinOncogenomics Laboratory, The National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City 14610, Mexico.
Mauricio Rodriguez-DorantesOncogenomics Laboratory, The National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City 14610, Mexico.
National Institute of Genomic Medicine · MXHospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez · MXInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is used as a clinical biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis; however, a large number of patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with PSA levels in the 'gray area' (4-10 ng/ml) are currently subjected to unnecessary biopsy due to overdiagnosis. Certain microRNAs (miRs) have been proven to be useful biomarkers, several of which are detectable in bodily fluids. The present study identified and validated a urinary miR‑based signature to enhance the specificity of PCa diagnosis and to reduce the number of patients with benign conditions undergoing biopsy. Seventy‑three urine samples from Mexican patients with diagnosis of PCa with a Gleason score ≥7 and 70 patients diagnosed with BPH were collected after digital rectal examination (DRE) of the prostate. miR expression profiles were determined using TaqMan Low Density Array experiments, and normalized Ct values for the miRs were compared between PCa and BPH groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate whether miR detection in urine is suitable for distinguishing patients with PCa from those with BPH. The identified miR‑100/200b signature was significantly correlated with PCa. Using a multivariable logistic regression approach, a base model including the clinical variables age, prostate‑specific antigen (PSA), the percentage of free PSA and DRE was generated, and a second base model additionally contained the miR‑100/200b signature. ROC analysis demonstrated that the combined model significantly outperformed the capacity of PSA (P<0.001) and the base model (P=0.01) to discriminate between PCa and BPH patients. In terms of evaluation of the sub‑group of patients in the gray zone of PSA levels, the performance of the combined model for predicting PCa cases was significantly superior to PSA level determination (P<0.001) and the base model (P=0.009). In addition, decision curve analysis demonstrated that the use of the combined model increased the clinical benefit for patients and produced a substantial reduction in unnecessary biopsies across a range of reasonable threshold probabilities (10‑50%). Detection of the urinary miR signature identified in the present study as part of clinical diagnostic procedures will enhance the accuracy of PCa diagnosis and provide a clinical benefit for patients with BPH by sparing them from undergoing invasive biopsy. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to describe the profiling of urinary miR100 and miR-200b levels for the clinical diagnosis of PCa.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyGene Expression ProfilingHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingOdds RatioProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsRNA StabilityBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID27081843
PMCPMC4878542
OpenAlexW2327146806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.