Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081700›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Gene identification for risk of relapse in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients: a combined methodology of gene expression profiling and computational gene network analysis.

Vienna Ludovini, Fortunato Bianconi, Annamaria Siggillino, Danilo Piobbico, Jacopo Vannucci, Giulio Metro, Rita Chiari, Guido Bellezza, Francesco Puma, Maria Agnese Della Fazia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PRSS1 Upregulation Predicts Platinum Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vienna LudoviniMedical Oncology, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Fortunato BianconiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Annamaria SiggillinoMedical Oncology, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Danilo PiobbicoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Jacopo VannucciDepartment of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giulio MetroMedical Oncology, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Rita ChiariMedical Oncology, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Guido BellezzaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, Perugia, Italy.
Francesco PumaDepartment of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Maria Agnese Della FaziaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giuseppe ServilloDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Lucio CrinòMedical Oncology, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk assessment and treatment choice remains a challenge in early non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to identify novel genes involved in the risk of early relapse (ER) compared to no relapse (NR) in resected lung adenocarcinoma (AD) patients using a combination of high throughput technology and computational analysis. We identified 18 patients (n.13 NR and n.5 ER) with stage I AD. Frozen samples of patients in ER, NR and corresponding normal lung (NL) were subjected to Microarray technology and quantitative-PCR (Q-PCR). A gene network computational analysis was performed to select predictive genes. An independent set of 79 ADs stage I samples was used to validate selected genes by Q-PCR.From microarray analysis we selected 50 genes, using the fold change ratio of ER versus NR. They were validated both in pool and individually in patient samples (ER and NR) by Q-PCR. Fourteen increased and 25 decreased genes showed a concordance between two methods. They were used to perform a computational gene network analysis that identified 4 increased (HOXA10, CLCA2, AKR1B10, FABP3) and 6 decreased (SCGB1A1, PGC, TFF1, PSCA, SPRR1B and PRSS1) genes. Moreover, in an independent dataset of ADs samples, we showed that both high FABP3 expression and low SCGB1A1 expression was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS).Our results indicate that it is possible to define, through gene expression and computational analysis, a characteristic gene profiling of patients with an increased risk of relapse that may become a tool for patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, Localcancer systems biologycomputational biologygene expression profilinggene networkslung adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27081700
PMCPMC5058701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.