Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081694›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Mitochondrial DNA content in breast cancer: Impact on in vitro and in vivo phenotype and patient prognosis.

Marjolein J A Weerts, Anieta M Sieuwerts, Marcel Smid, Maxime P Look, John A Foekens, Stefan Sleijfer, John W M Martens

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marjolein J A WeertsDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anieta M SieuwertsDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel SmidDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maxime P LookDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John A FoekensDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefan SleijferDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John W M MartensDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content in breast cancer cell lines has been associated with transition towards a mesenchymal phenotype, but its clinical consequences concerning breast cancer dissemination remain unidentified. Here, we aimed to clarify the link between mtDNA content and a mesenchymal phenotype and its relation to prognosis of breast cancer patients. We analyzed mtDNA content in 42 breast cancer cell lines and 207 primary breast tumor specimens using a combination of quantitative PCR and array-based copy number analysis. By associating mtDNA content with expression levels of genes involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and with the intrinsic breast cancer subtypes, we could not identify a relation between low mtDNA content and mesenchymal properties in the breast cancer cell lines or in the primary breast tumors. In addition, we explored the relation between mtDNA content and prognosis in our cohort of primary breast tumor specimens that originated from patients with lymph node-negative disease who did not receive any (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. When patients were divided based on the tumor quartile levels of mtDNA content, those in the lowest quarter (≤ 350 mtDNA molecules per cell) showed a poorer 10-year distant metastasis-free survival than patients with > 350 mtDNA molecules per cell (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.29-0.87], P = 0.015). The poor prognosis was independent of established clinicopathological markers (HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.30-0.97], P = 0.038). We conclude that, despite a lack of evidence between mtDNA content and EMT, low mtDNA content might provide meaningful prognostic value for distant metastasis in breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDNA, MitochondrialEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisDNA, Mitochondrialbreast cancerdistant metastasisepithelial-to-mesenchymal transitionmitochondrial DNAmtDNA content

Identifiers

PMID27081694
PMCPMC5045386
OpenAlexW2319688404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.