Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081657›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2016

A randomized placebo-controlled lovastatin trial for neurobehavioral function in neurofibromatosis I.

Carrie E Bearden, Gerhard S Hellemann, Tena Rosser, Caroline Montojo, Rachel Jonas, Nicole Enrique, Laura Pacheco, Shaun A Hussain, Joyce Y Wu, Jennifer S Ho and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cells · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carrie E BeardenDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Gerhard S HellemannDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Tena RosserChildren's Hospital Los Angeles USC Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles California.
Caroline MontojoDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Rachel JonasDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Nicole EnriqueDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Laura PachecoDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Shaun A HussainDivision of Pediatric Neurology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Joyce Y WuDivision of Pediatric Neurology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Jennifer S HoSan Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology Los Angeles California.
James J McGoughDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Catherine A SugarDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California; Department of Biostatistics University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
Alcino J SilvaDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California; Department of Neurobiology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ANTON, PETER A · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
Mechanisms for Neurological Dysfunction in NF1 and Noonan SyndromeR01MH084315 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SILVA, ALCINO J. · 2008 to 2020
$5.0M
Neurofibromatosis Type I as a Model for Therapeutic NeuroadaptationR34MH089299 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BEARDEN, CARRIE E · 2009 to 2011
$691k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084315NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH089299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLovastatin has been shown to reverse learning deficits in a mouse model of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), a common monogenic disorder caused by a mutation in the Ras-MAPK pathway and associated with learning disabilities. We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to assess lovastatin's effects on cognition and behavior in patients with NF1.

methodForty-four NF1 patients (mean age 25.7+/-11.6 years; 64% female) were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of lovastatin (N = 23; maximum dose of 80 mg/day for adult participants and 40 mg/day for children) or placebo (N = 21). Based on findings in the mouse model, primary outcome measures were nonverbal learning and working memory. Secondary outcome measures included verbal memory, attention, and self/parent-reported behavioral problems, as well as tolerability of medication. Participants also underwent neuroimaging assessments at baseline and 14 weeks, to determine whether neural biomarkers were associated with treatment response. Linear mixed models assessed for differential treatment effects on outcome measures.

resultsTwelve participants dropped from the study prior to completion (8 placebo, 4 lovastatin), resulting in 32 completers (15 placebo, 17 lovastatin). Lovastatin was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events. Differential improvement favoring lovastatin treatment was observed for one primary (working memory; effect size f (2) = 0.70, P < 0.01) and two secondary outcome measures (verbal memory, f (2) = 0.19, P = 0.02, and adult self-reported internalizing problems, f (2) = 0.26, P = 0.03). Exploratory moderator analyses revealed that higher baseline neural activity in frontal regions was associated with larger treatment effects.

interpretationThese preliminary results suggest beneficial effects of lovastatin on some learning and memory functions, as well as internalizing symptoms in patients with NF1.

Identifiers

PMID27081657
PMCPMC4818747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.