Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081645›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2016

Integrating palliative care in oncologic emergency departments: Challenges and opportunities.

Ahmed F Elsayem, Hiba E Elzubeir, Patricia A Brock, Knox H Todd

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06615349 (DigiPall; a Randomized Controlled Trial of Digital Patient Reported Outcome and Biomarker Monitoring in Palliative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06615349 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

DigiPall; a Randomized Controlled Trial of Digital Patient Reported Outcome and Biomarker Monitoring in Palliative Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorDavid BlumRan2025 to 2027Enrolled382ConditionsTerminal Illness, Terminal CancerArmsDigiPall
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed F ElsayemAhmed F Elsayem, Hiba E Elzubeir, Patricia A Brock, Knox H Todd, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Hiba E ElzubeirAhmed F Elsayem, Hiba E Elzubeir, Patricia A Brock, Knox H Todd, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Patricia A BrockAhmed F Elsayem, Hiba E Elzubeir, Patricia A Brock, Knox H Todd, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Knox H ToddAhmed F Elsayem, Hiba E Elzubeir, Patricia A Brock, Knox H Todd, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although visiting the emergency departments (EDs) is considered poor quality of cancer care, there are indications these visits are increasing. Similarly, there is growing interest in providing palliative care (PC) to cancer patients in EDs. However, this integration is not without major challenges. In this article, we review the literature on why cancer patients visit EDs, the rates of hospitalization and mortality for these patients, and the models for integrating PC in EDs. We discuss opportunities such integration will bring to the quality of cancer care, and resource utilization of resources. We also discuss barriers faced by this integration. We found that the most common reasons for ED visits by cancer patients are pain, fever, shortness of breath, and gastrointestinal symptoms. The majority of the patients are admitted to hospitals, about 13% of the admitted patients die during hospitalization, and some patients die in ED. Patients who receive PC at an ED have shorter hospitalization and lower resource utilization. Models based solely on increasing PC provision in EDs by PC specialists have had modest success, while very limited ED-based PC provision has had slightly higher impact. However, details of these programs are lacking, and coordination between ED based PC and hospital-wide PC is not clear. In some studies, the objectives were to improve care in the communities and reduce ED visits and hospitalizations. We conclude that as more patients receive cancer therapy late in their disease trajectory, more cancer patients will visit EDs. Integration of PC with emergency medicine will require active participation of ED physicians in providing PC to cancer patients. PC specialist should play an active role in educating ED physicians about PC, and provide timely consultations. The impact of integrating PC in EDs on quality and cost of cancer care should be studied.

Indexed as

CancerCostEmergency departmentIntegrationPalliative careQuality

Identifiers

PMID27081645
PMCPMC4826968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.