Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081422›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2016

Factors Influencing Changes in Hemoglobin A1c and Body Weight During Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Ipragliflozin: Interim Analysis of the ASSIGN-K Study.

Kotaro Iemitsu, Takashi Iizuka, Masahiro Takihata, Masahiko Takai, Shigeru Nakajima, Nobuaki Minami, Shinichi Umezawa, Akira Kanamori, Hiroshi Takeda, Takehiro Kawata and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Kotaro IemitsuStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takashi IizukaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masahiro TakihataStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masahiko TakaiStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shigeru NakajimaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Nobuaki MinamiStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shinichi UmezawaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akira KanamoriStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi TakedaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takehiro KawataStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shogo ItoStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taisuke KikuchiStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hikaru AmemiyaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mizuki KaneshiroStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Atsuko MokuboStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tetsuro TakumaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hideo MachimuraStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keiji TanakaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taro AsakuraStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akira KubotaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sachio AoyagiStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazuhiko HoshinoStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masashi IshikawaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mitsuo ObanaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Nobuo SasaiStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hideaki KaneshigeStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masaaki MiyakawaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yasushi TanakaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan; Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yasuo TerauchiDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ikuro MatsubaStudy Group of the Diabetes Committee, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIpragliflozin is a selective sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that blocks glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubules. SGLT2 inhibitors are expected to be effective in patients with insulin resistance and obesity, but it is important to select treatment according to patient background factors that minimizes the risk of adverse events. There have been a limited number of investigations into the relationship between the clinical efficacy (reducing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight (BW)) or safety of SGLT2 inhibitors and patient characteristics.

methodsASSIGN-K is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective observational study examining the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin (50 - 100 mg/day for 52 weeks) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had inadequate glycemic control with HbA1c ≥ 6.0% (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program) despite diet and exercise therapy or diet and exercise plus antidiabetic drug therapy. We conducted an interim analysis of the relationship between changes in HbA1c or BW and characteristics in patients who had been on treatment for more than 12 weeks.

resultsIn 257 patients completing 12 weeks of treatment, HbA1c decreased significantly from 8.23% to 7.55% (-0.68%, P < 0.01). The change in HbA1c after 12 weeks was -0.17%, -0.33%, and -1.16% when baseline HbA1c was < 7%, 7% to < 8%, and ≥ 8%, respectively (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively), and -1.30%, -0.62%, and -0.62% when baseline body mass index (BMI) was < 25, 25 to < 30, and ≥ 30, respectively (all P < 0.01). Stratified analysis showed that age, gender, or BMI did not have a significant influence on the improvement in HbA1c. Multiple regression analysis showed that reduction in HbA1c was greater as baseline HbA1c increased and the duration of diabetes decreased. A higher baseline HbA1c was associated with less weight loss.

conclusionsIpragliflozin significantly improved HbA1c in patients with T2DM. HbA1c improved more when baseline HbA1c was higher and the duration of diabetes was shorter, suggesting that current treatment policies for diabetes could be re-examined.

Indexed as

Body weightHemoglobin A1cInterim analysisIpragliflozinPatient characteristicsSelective sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitorType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID27081422
PMCPMC4817576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.