Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081036›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2016

Cardiotoxicity as indicated by LVEF and troponin T sensitivity following two anthracycline-based regimens in lymphoma: Results from a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Kai Xue, Juan J Gu, Qunling Zhang, Xiaojian Liu, Jiachen Wang, Xiao-Qiu Li, Jianfeng Luo, Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, Stanley F Fernandez, Myron S Czuczman and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. New Concepts in Cardio-Oncology.Cancer treatment and research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai XueDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Juan J GuDepartment of Medicine & Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Qunling ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaojian LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiachen WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Qiu LiDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jianfeng LuoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Francisco J Hernandez-IlizaliturriDepartment of Medicine & Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Stanley F FernandezDepartment of Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Myron S CzuczmanDepartment of Medicine & Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Junning CaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaonan HongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ye GuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNFudan University · CNUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity influences treatment selection and may negatively affect clinical outcomes in lymphoma patients. While epirubicin induced cardiotoxicity less often than the same dose of doxorubicin in breast cancer, higher doses of epirubicin are required in lymphoma regimens for equivalent efficacy. Whether a higher dosage of epirubicin also induces cardiotoxicity less often than doxorubicin in lymphoma remains unknown. We therefore administered 6-8 cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (CEpOP) +/- rituximab (R) with either epirubicin (CEpOP) or doxorubicin (CHOP) to patients (N=398) with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FLG3). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and high-sensitivity serum cardiac troponin T (HsTnT) were assessed at baseline and after 4 cycles of treatment. Epirubicin (70 mg/m2/dose) was equivalent to doxorubicin (50 mg/m2/dose) in terms of 3-year progression-free survival. The risk of decreased LVEF was similar between the two regimens. CEpOP+/-R induced HsTnT elevation less often than CHOP+/-R. We conclude that CEpOP+/-R is a more acceptable regimen with short-term efficacy similar to CHOP+/-R in lymphoma patients. Longer follow-up is needed to monitor the risk of cardiac dysfunction and determine whether differences in the induction of elevated HsTnT between epirubicin and doxorubicin justify changes in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCardiotoxicityFemaleHumansLymphoma, FollicularLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTroponin TVentricular Function, LeftYoung AdultAnthracyclinesTroponin Tcardiac toxicitydoxorubicinepirubicinhigh-sensitivity troponin T

Identifiers

PMID27081036
PMCPMC5078030
OpenAlexW2333410636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.