Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27081002›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2016

The three-legged stool of evidence-based practice in eating disorder treatment: research, clinical, and patient perspectives.

Carol B Peterson, Carolyn Black Becker, Janet Treasure, Roz Shafran, Rachel Bryant-Waugh

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Therapist adherence to family-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A multi-site exploratory study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A Study on Online Intervention for Early Childhood Eating Disorders during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carol B PetersonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, F282/2A West, 2450 Riverside Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA. peter161@umn.edu.
Carolyn Black BeckerDepartment of Psychology, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Janet TreasureDepartment of Psychological Medicine, IOPPN, King's College, London, UK.
Roz ShafranInstitute of Child Health, University College, London, UK.
Rachel Bryant-WaughGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.

Funding

Obesity and Energy Metabolism CoreP30DK050456 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CROW, SCOTT J · 1995 to 2015
$17.0M
Healthy weight intervention in female athletes: A randomized controlled trialR01MH094448 · NIMH · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI BECKER, CAROLYN BLACK, STEWART, TIFFANY MAE · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
1/2-Integrative Cognitive Affective Therapy for Binge Eating DisorderR34MH099040 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PETERSON, CAROL B. · 2013 to 2015
$684k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050456NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK050456NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094448NIMH NIH HHS R01MH094448NIMH NIH HHS R34MH0989040NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based practice in eating disorders incorporates three essential components: research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values, preferences, and characteristics. Conceptualized as a 'three-legged stool' by Sackett et al. in 1996 (BMJ), all of these components of evidence-based practice are considered essential for providing optimal care in the treatment of eating disorders. However, the extent to which these individual aspects of evidence-based practice are valued among clinicians and researchers is variable, with each of these stool 'legs' being neglected at times. As a result, empirical support and patient preferences for treatment are not consistently considered in the selection and implementation of eating disorder treatment. In addition, clinicians may not have access to training to provide treatments supported by research and preferred by patients. Despite these challenges, integrating these three components of evidence-based practice is critical for the effective treatment of eating disorders. DISCUSSION: Current research supports the use of several types of psychotherapies, including cognitive-behavioral, interpersonal, and family-based therapies, as well as certain types of medications for the treatment of eating disorders. However, limitations in current research, including sample heterogeneity, inconsistent efficacy, a paucity of data, the need for tailored approaches, and the use of staging models highlight the need for clinical expertise. Although preliminary data also support the importance of patient preferences, values, and perspectives for optimizing treatment, enhancing treatment outcome, and minimizing attrition among patients with eating disorders, the extent to which patient preference is consistently predictive of outcome is less clear and requires further investigation. All three components of evidence-based practice are integral for the optimal treatment of eating disorders. Integrating clinical expertise and patient perspective may also facilitate the dissemination of empirically-supported and emerging treatments as well as prevention programs. Further research is imperative to identify ways in which this three-legged approach to eating disorder treatment could be most effectively implemented.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementEvidence-Based PracticeFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansPatient PreferencePsychotherapyTreatment OutcomeAnorexia nervosaBinge eating disorderBulimia nervosaEating disordersTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID27081002
PMCPMC4832531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.