ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016
The CaPTHUS score as predictor of multiglandular primary hyperparathyroidism in a European population.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between preoperative biochemical indices and intraoperative findings in primary hyperparathyroidism.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Primary hyperparathyroidism: predictors of sporadic multi-gland disease.Endocrine connections · 2024Review
- A contemporary analysis of the pre- and intraoperative recognition of multigland parathyroid disease.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Review
- Usefulness of the Wisconsin and CaPTHUS indices for predicting multiglandular disease in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism in a southern European population.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Wisconsin and CaPTHUS Indices Usefulness for Predicting Monoglandular and Multiglandular Disease in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism through the Analysis of a Single-Center Experience.International journal of endocrinology · 2021Article
- Current predictive models do not accurately differentiate between single and multi gland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism: a retrospective cohort study of two endocrine surgery units.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFocused parathyroidectomy has been proven to be a safe technique for the treatment of single-gland primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). The CaPTHUS scoring model has been reported to be an accurate preoperative diagnostic tool for distinguishing single-gland (SGD) from multiglandular disease (MGD), including preoperative serum calcium and PTH values plus ultrasound and Sestamibi scanning. The purpose of the present study was to validate the CaPTHUS model for the population in southern Europe, since the North American and the European populations show different clinicopathological profiles in PHPT.
methodsThis is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients diagnosed with PHPT who underwent surgical treatment in a single referral center. Differences between SGD and MGD groups were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student's t test for continuous variables. Overall diagnostic accuracy of the scoring model was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). A p < 0.05 level was accepted as significant.
resultsFrom January 2001 to November 2014, 241 patients were included in the study, of whom 92.1 % had SGD and 71.8 % had a CaPTHUS score ≥3. SGD was distinguished from MGD (p < 0.001) using the dichotomous scoring model based on an AUC value of 0.762. Scores ≥3 had a sensitivity of 76.5 % and a positive predictive value of 96 % for SGD.
conclusionsDespite good test performance, a CaPTHUS score ≥3 does not discard MGD definitely. Intraoperative adjuncts are still needed to further reduce the risk of missing MGD during selective parathyroidectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27080995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.