Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27080487›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2016

Identifying variation in models of care for the genomic-based diagnosis of inherited retinal dystrophies in the United Kingdom.

M Eden, K Payne, C Jones, S J Wright, G Hall, M McAllister, G Black

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the feasibility of delivering standardized genomic care using ophthalmology as an example.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M EdenManchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
K PayneManchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
C JonesManchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
S J WrightManchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
G HallManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Saint Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
M McAllisterCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
G BlackManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Saint Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeAdvances in genomic technologies are prompting a realignment of diagnostic and management pathways for rare inherited disease. New models of care are being developed as genomic-based diagnostic testing becomes increasingly relevant within more and more aspects of medicine. This study describes current care models for the provision of a genomic-based diagnosis for patients with inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) in UK clinical practice.MethodsA structured telephone survey, conducted (in 2014) with all 23 UK Regional Genetics Centres and a sample of specialist ophthalmology centres (n=4), was used to describe models of service delivery and current levels of genomic-based diagnostic testing. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended questions were summarised using thematic analysis.ResultsOf the 27 centres 10 of them saw IRD patients in 'generic' clinics and 17 centres offered ophthalmic-specific clinics. Extensive regional variation was observed in numbers of patients seen and in how care for the diagnosis and management of IRD was provided.ConclusionsUnderstanding current practice is a necessary first step in the development and evaluation of complex interventions, such as care models for the genomic-based diagnosis of inherited eye conditions. Presented findings here relating to disparities in care provision are potentially linked to previously reported evidence of perceived unmet needs and expectations of IRD service users. This work provides a foundation for the integration of new care models in mainstream medicine.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDisease ManagementGenetic TestingGenomicsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansRetinal DystrophiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID27080487
PMCPMC4941073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.