Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27080375›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2016

The In Vitro and In Vivo Response to MMP-Sensitive Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Hydrogels.

Luke D Amer, Stephanie J Bryant

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke D AmerDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, 3415 Colorado Ave, UCB 596, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.
Stephanie J BryantDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, 3415 Colorado Ave, UCB 596, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA. Stephanie.Bryant@Colorado.EDU.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

The Interplay between Macrophages and Differentiating MSCs in Cell-Laden HydrogelR21AR064436 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BRYANT, STEPHANIE J · 2013 to 2014
$358k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR064436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme-sensitive hydrogels are a promising class of materials for cell encapsulation and tissue engineering because their ability to be degraded by cell-secreted factors. However, it is well known that nearly all synthetic biomaterials elicit a foreign body response (FBR) upon implantation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo response to an enzyme-sensitive hydrogel. Hydrogels were formed from poly(ethylene glycol) with the peptide crosslinker, C-VPLS↓LYSG-C, which is susceptible to matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9. We evaluated the hydrogel by exogenously delivered enzymes, encapsulated mesenchymal stem cells as a tissue engineering relevant cell type, and by macrophage-secreted factors in vitro and for the FBR through macrophage attachment in vitro and in a subcutaneous mouse model. These hydrogels rapidly degraded upon exposure to exogenous MMP-2 and to lesser degree with MMP-9. Encapsulated mesenchymal stem cells were capable of degrading the hydrogels via matrix metalloproteinases. Inflammatory macrophages were confirmed to attach to the hydrogels, but were not capable of rapidly degrading the hydrogels. In vivo, these hydrogels remained intact after 4 weeks and exhibited a classic FBR with inflammatory cells at the hydrogel surface and a fibrous capsule. In summary, these findings suggest that while this MMP-2/9 sensitive hydrogel is readily degraded in vitro, it does not undergo rapid degradation by the FBR. Thus, the long term stability of these hydrogels in vivo coupled with the ability for encapsulated cells to degrade the hydrogel makes them promising materials for tissue engineering.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCells, ImmobilizedHydrogelsMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9Mesenchymal Stem CellsMicePolyethylene GlycolsTissue EngineeringHydrogelsMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9Mmp9 protein, mousepolyethylene glycol 1000Polyethylene GlycolsCell encapsulationEnzyme-sensitive hydrogelForeign body responseMacrophageMesenchymal stem cell

Identifiers

PMID27080375
PMCPMC5577801
OpenAlexW2464691465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.