Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27080203›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2016

Applying a new quantitative global breast MRI feature analysis scheme to assess tumor response to chemotherapy.

Faranak Aghaei, Maxine Tan, Alan B Hollingsworth, Bin Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast: How Is It Used?Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Machine learning in breast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Developing global image feature analysis models to predict cancer risk and prognosis.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faranak AghaeiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Maxine TanSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Alan B HollingsworthMercy Women's Center, Mercy Health Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Bin ZhengSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA. Bin.Zheng-1@ou.edu.

Funding

Increasing Cancer Detection Yield Using Breast MRI Screening ModalityR01CA197150 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, ALAN B., LIU, HONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Mammographic Density and Tissue Asymmetry Based Breast Cancer Risk StratificationR01CA160205 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZHENG, BIN · 2012 to 2015
$895k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160205NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a new quantitative global kinetic breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features analysis scheme and assess its feasibility to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsA dataset involving breast MR images acquired from 151 cancer patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used. Among them, 63 patients had complete response (CR) and 88 had partial response (PR) to chemotherapy based on the RECIST criterion. A computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme was applied to segment breast region depicted on the breast MR images and computed a total of 10 kinetic image features to represent parenchyma enhancement either from the entire two breasts or the bilateral asymmetry between the two breasts. To classify between CR and PR cases, we tested an attribution selected classifier that integrates with an artificial neural network and a Wrapper Subset Evaluator. The classifier was trained and tested using a leave-one-case-out (LOCO)-based cross-validation method. The area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed to assess classifier performance.

resultsFrom the pool of initial 10 features, four features were selected by more than 90% times in the LOCO cross-validation iterations. Among them, three represent the bilateral asymmetry of kinetic features between two breasts. Using the classifier yielded AUC = 0.83 ± 0.04, which is significantly higher than using each individual feature to classify between CR and PR cases (P < 0.05).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that quantitative analysis of global kinetic features computed from breast MRI-acquired prechemotherapy has potential to generate a useful clinical marker that is associated with tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1099-1106.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDrug MonitoringFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic Agentsassessment of breast cancer prognosisbilateral asymmetry of parenchyma breast MR enhancementdynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imagingquantitative image feature analysistumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27080203
PMCPMC5061590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.