ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2016
Whole-genome sequence data uncover loss of genetic diversity due to selection.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising the Use of Cryopreserved Genetic Resources for the Selection and Conservation of Animal Populations.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- A 17.1 kb duplication downstream GATA6 is strongly associated with egg weight in chicken.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Maintenance of genetic diversity in subdivided populations using genomic coancestry matrices.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association scan and candidate gene analysis for seed coat color in sesame (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Article
- Biological control needs evolutionary perspectives of ecological interactions.Evolutionary applications · 2022Review
- Selection and Drift: A Comparison between Historic and Recent Dutch Friesian Cattle and Recent Holstein Friesian Using WGS Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Opportunities of Genomics for the Use of Semen Cryo-Conserved in Gene Banks.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- The value of genomic relationship matrices to estimate levels of inbreeding.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Article
- Intensified Use of Reproductive Technologies and Reduced Dimensions of Breeding Schemes Put Genetic Diversity at Risk in Dairy Cattle Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Management of Genetic Diversity in the Era of Genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Variants in Domestic and Wild Bactrian Camels Using Whole-Genome Sequencing Data.International journal of genomics · 2020Article
- The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
- Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- Which Individuals To Choose To Update the Reference Population? Minimizing the Loss of Genetic Diversity in Animal Genomic Selection Programs.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Long-Term Impact of Optimum Contribution Selection Strategies on Local Livestock Breeds with Historical Introgression Using the Example of German Angler Cattle.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Differential gene expression and SNP association between fast- and slow-growing turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Novel optimum contribution selection methods accounting for conflicting objectives in breeding programs for livestock breeds with historical migration.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhole-genome sequence (WGS) data give access to more complete structural genetic information of individuals, including rare variants, not fully covered by single nucleotide polymorphism chips. We used WGS to investigate the amount of genetic diversity remaining after selection using optimal contribution (OC), considering different methods to estimate the relationships used in OC. OC was applied to minimise average relatedness of the selection candidates and thus miminise the loss of genetic diversity in a conservation strategy, e.g. for establishment of gene bank collections. Furthermore, OC was used to maximise average genetic merit of the selection candidates at a given level of relatedness, similar to a genetic improvement strategy. In this study, we used data from 277 bulls from the 1000 bull genomes project. We measured genetic diversity as the number of variants still segregating after selection using WGS data, and compared strategies that targeted conservation of rare (minor allele frequency <5 %) versus common variants.
resultsWhen OC without restriction on the number of selected individuals was applied, loss of variants was minimal and most individuals were selected, which is often unfeasible in practice. When 20 individuals were selected, the number of segregating rare variants was reduced by 29 % for the conservation strategy, and by 34 % for the genetic improvement strategy. The overall number of segregating variants was reduced by 30 % when OC was restricted to selecting five individuals, for both conservation and genetic improvement strategies. For common variants, this loss was about 15 %, while it was much higher, 72 %, for rare variants. Fewer rare variants were conserved with the genetic improvement strategy compared to the conservation strategy.
conclusionsThe use of WGS for genetic diversity quantification revealed that selection results in considerable losses of genetic diversity for rare variants. Using WGS instead of SNP chip data to estimate relationships slightly reduced the loss of rare variants, while using 50 K SNP chip data was sufficient to conserve common variants. The loss of rare variants could be mitigated by a few percent (up to 8 %) depending on which method is chosen to estimate relationships from WGS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.