Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27080121›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2016

Whole-genome sequence data uncover loss of genetic diversity due to selection.

Sonia E Eynard, Jack J Windig, Sipke J Hiemstra, Mario P L Calus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimising the Use of Cryopreserved Genetic Resources for the Selection and Conservation of Animal Populations.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonia E EynardAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. sonia.eynard@wur.nl.
Jack J WindigAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sipke J HiemstraCentre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands, Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 338, 3700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mario P L CalusAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-genome sequence (WGS) data give access to more complete structural genetic information of individuals, including rare variants, not fully covered by single nucleotide polymorphism chips. We used WGS to investigate the amount of genetic diversity remaining after selection using optimal contribution (OC), considering different methods to estimate the relationships used in OC. OC was applied to minimise average relatedness of the selection candidates and thus miminise the loss of genetic diversity in a conservation strategy, e.g. for establishment of gene bank collections. Furthermore, OC was used to maximise average genetic merit of the selection candidates at a given level of relatedness, similar to a genetic improvement strategy. In this study, we used data from 277 bulls from the 1000 bull genomes project. We measured genetic diversity as the number of variants still segregating after selection using WGS data, and compared strategies that targeted conservation of rare (minor allele frequency <5 %) versus common variants.

resultsWhen OC without restriction on the number of selected individuals was applied, loss of variants was minimal and most individuals were selected, which is often unfeasible in practice. When 20 individuals were selected, the number of segregating rare variants was reduced by 29 % for the conservation strategy, and by 34 % for the genetic improvement strategy. The overall number of segregating variants was reduced by 30 % when OC was restricted to selecting five individuals, for both conservation and genetic improvement strategies. For common variants, this loss was about 15 %, while it was much higher, 72 %, for rare variants. Fewer rare variants were conserved with the genetic improvement strategy compared to the conservation strategy.

conclusionsThe use of WGS for genetic diversity quantification revealed that selection results in considerable losses of genetic diversity for rare variants. Using WGS instead of SNP chip data to estimate relationships slightly reduced the loss of rare variants, while using 50 K SNP chip data was sufficient to conserve common variants. The loss of rare variants could be mitigated by a few percent (up to 8 %) depending on which method is chosen to estimate relationships from WGS data.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomicsAlgorithmsAnimalsCattleGene FrequencyGenomeGenotypeMalePedigreeSelective Breeding

Identifiers

PMID27080121
PMCPMC4831198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.