Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27080103›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2016

Network of epistatic interactions within a yeast snoRNA.

Olga Puchta, Botond Cseke, Hubert Czaja, David Tollervey, Guido Sanguinetti, Grzegorz Kudla

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cryo-EM structure and functional landscape of an RNA polymerase ribozyme.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ancient transcriptional regulators can easily evolve new pair-wise cooperativity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What Has Genomics Taught An Evolutionary Biologist?Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Higher-order epistasis and phenotypic prediction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olga PuchtaMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK.
Botond CsekeSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Hubert CzajaScott Tiger SA, Warsaw, Poland.
David TollerveySynthSys, Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Guido SanguinettiSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. SynthSys, Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Grzegorz KudlaMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK. gkudla@gmail.com.
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

European Research Council 306999Medical Research Council MC_UU_12018/23Wellcome Trust 077248Wellcome Trust 097383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epistatic interactions play a fundamental role in molecular evolution, but little is known about the spatial distribution of these interactions within genes. To systematically survey a model landscape of intragenic epistasis, we quantified the fitness of ~60,000 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing randomly mutated variants of the 333-nucleotide-long U3 small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA). The fitness effects of individual mutations were correlated with evolutionary conservation and structural stability. Many mutations had small individual effects but had large effects in the context of additional mutations, which indicated negative epistasis. Clusters of negative interactions were explained by local thermodynamic threshold effects, whereas positive interactions were enriched among large-effect sites and between base-paired nucleotides. We conclude that high-throughput mapping of intragenic epistasis can identify key structural and functional features of macromolecules.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalEvolution, MolecularGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic VariationMutagenesisMutationRNA FoldingRNA, Small NucleolarSaccharomyces cerevisiaeThermodynamicsRNA, Small NucleolarRNA, U3 small nucleolar

Identifiers

PMID27080103
PMCPMC5137784
OpenAlexW2338807579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.