Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27079843›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2016

New Learning and Unlearning: Strangers or Accomplices in Threat Memory Attenuation?

Roger L Clem, Daniela Schiller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prazosin during threat discrimination boosts memory of the safe stimulus.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Memory engram stability and flexibility.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Engrams of Fear Memory Attenuation.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Olfactory threat extinction in the piriform cortex: An age-dependent employment of NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Locus coeruleus input-modulated reactivation of dentate gyrus opioid-withdrawal engrams promotes extinction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  18. Opto-extinction of a threat memory in mice.Brain research bulletin · 2022
    Article
  19. Hippocampus and amygdala fear memory engrams re-emerge after contextual fear relapse.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roger L ClemDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: roger.clem@mssm.edu.
Daniela SchillerDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Fear learning and reconsolidation after trauma exposure a computational approachR01MH105535 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HARPAZ-ROTEM, ILAN, SCHILLER, DANIELA · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Noradrenergic circuit mechanisms of persistent fearR01MH105414 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CLEM, ROGER L · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105414NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve greatest efficacy, therapies for attenuating fear and anxiety should preclude the re-emergence of emotional responses. Of relevance to this aim, preclinical models of threat memory reduction are considered to engage one of two discrete neural processes: either establishment of a new behavioral response that competes with, and thereby temporarily interferes with the expression of, threat memory (new learning) or one that modifies and thereby disrupts threat memory (unlearning). We contend that a strict dichotomy of new learning and unlearning does not provide a compelling explanation for current data. Instead, we suggest that the evidence warrants consideration of alternative models that assume cooperation rather than competition between formation of new cellular traces and the modification of preexisting ones.

Indexed as

BrainConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalHumansLearningMemoryengramextinctionmemoryreconsolidation

Identifiers

PMID27079843
PMCPMC4972342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.