Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27079791›Full record

ReviewBMC plant biology2016

Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses.

Vivek Verma, Pratibha Ravindran, Prakash P Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 872 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
872citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

872 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification of WNK Gene inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Towards an integrated molecular understanding of plant hormones.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

812 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vivek VermaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Pratibha RavindranDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Prakash P KumarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. Prakash.kumar@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeing sessile organisms, plants are often exposed to a wide array of abiotic and biotic stresses. Abiotic stress conditions include drought, heat, cold and salinity, whereas biotic stress arises mainly from bacteria, fungi, viruses, nematodes and insects. To adapt to such adverse situations, plants have evolved well-developed mechanisms that help to perceive the stress signal and enable optimal growth response. Phytohormones play critical roles in helping the plants to adapt to adverse environmental conditions. The elaborate hormone signaling networks and their ability to crosstalk make them ideal candidates for mediating defense responses.

resultsRecent research findings have helped to clarify the elaborate signaling networks and the sophisticated crosstalk occurring among the different hormone signaling pathways. In this review, we summarize the roles of the major plant hormones in regulating abiotic and biotic stress responses with special focus on the significance of crosstalk between different hormones in generating a sophisticated and efficient stress response. We divided the discussion into the roles of ABA, salicylic acid, jasmonates and ethylene separately at the start of the review. Subsequently, we have discussed the crosstalk among them, followed by crosstalk with growth promoting hormones (gibberellins, auxins and cytokinins). These have been illustrated with examples drawn from selected abiotic and biotic stress responses. The discussion on seed dormancy and germination serves to illustrate the fine balance that can be enforced by the two key hormones ABA and GA in regulating plant responses to environmental signals.

conclusionsThe intricate web of crosstalk among the often redundant multitudes of signaling intermediates is just beginning to be understood. Future research employing genome-scale systems biology approaches to solve problems of such magnitude will undoubtedly lead to a better understanding of plant development. Therefore, discovering additional crosstalk mechanisms among various hormones in coordinating growth under stress will be an important theme in the field of abiotic stress research. Such efforts will help to reveal important points of genetic control that can be useful to engineer stress tolerant crops.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGene Expression Regulation, PlantModels, BiologicalPlant DevelopmentPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsPlantsSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsAbiotic stressAbscisic acid (ABA)Biotic stressCrosstalkGibberellins (GA)Jasmonates (JA)Plant hormonesSalicylic acid (SA)

Identifiers

PMID27079791
PMCPMC4831116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.