Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27079717›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2016

The Effect of Propofol Versus Isoflurane Anesthesia on Human Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers of Alzheimer's Disease: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Miles Berger, Jacob W Nadler, Allan Friedman, David L McDonagh, Ellen R Bennett, Mary Cooter, Wenjing Qi, Daniel T Laskowitz, Vikram Ponnusamy, Mark F Newman and 5 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive Review of Anesthetic Strategies for Patients With Neurodegenerative Diseases.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Miles BergerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jacob W NadlerDivision Chief, Neurosurgical Anesthesiology Medical Director, Postanesthesia Care Unit; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Allan FriedmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
David L McDonaghDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, Neurological Surgery, Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Ellen R BennettDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Mary CooterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Wenjing QiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel T LaskowitzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Vikram PonnusamyCollege of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Mark F NewmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Leslie M ShawDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David S WarnerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Joseph P MathewDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael L JamesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
MAD-PIA trial team
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USDuke University · USFlorida State University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING IN ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCHT32GM008600 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Miriam Treggiari · 1996 to 2026
$6.6M
Neuro-inflammation in Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: CSF and fMRI StudiesK76AG057022 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERGER, MILES · 2017 to 2022
$1.4M
The Significance of Perioperative Changes in CSF tau levels in the ElderlyR03AG050918 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERGER, MILES · 2015 to 2016
$219k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG057022NIA NIH HHS R03 AG050918NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical studies have found differential effects of isoflurane and propofol on the Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated markers tau, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and amyloid-β (Aβ).

objectiveWe asked whether isoflurane and propofol have differential effects on the tau/Aβ ratio (the primary outcome), and individual AD biomarkers. We also examined whether genetic/intraoperative factors influenced perioperative changes in AD biomarkers.

methodsPatients undergoing neurosurgical/otolaryngology procedures requiring lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drain placement were prospectively randomized to receive isoflurane (n = 21) or propofol (n = 18) for anesthetic maintenance. We measured perioperative CSF sample AD markers, performed genotyping assays, and examined intraoperative data from the electronic anesthesia record. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine changes in AD markers by anesthetic type over time.

resultsThe CSF tau/Aβ ratio did not differ between isoflurane- versus propofol-treated patients (p = 1.000). CSF tau/Aβ ratio and tau levels increased 10 and 24 h after drain placement (p = 2.002×10-6 and p = 1.985×10-6, respectively), mean CSF p-tau levels decreased (p = 0.005), and Aβ levels did not change (p = 0.152). There was no interaction between anesthetic treatment and time for any of these biomarkers. None of the examined genetic polymorphisms, including ApoE4, were associated with tau increase (n = 9 polymorphisms, p > 0.05 for all associations).

conclusionNeurosurgery/otolaryngology procedures are associated with an increase in the CSF tau/Aβ ratio, and this increase was not influenced by anesthetic type. The increased CSF tau/Aβ ratio was largely driven by increases in tau levels. Future work should determine the functional/prognostic significance of these perioperative CSF tau elevations.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, IntravenousAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnesthetics, IntravenousBiomarkersFemaleGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansIsofluraneMaleMiddle AgedPropofoltau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnesthetics, IntravenousBiomarkersIsofluranePropofoltau ProteinsAmyloid-betaanesthesiacerebrospinal fluidisofluranepropofolsurgerytau protein

Identifiers

PMID27079717
PMCPMC5938737
OpenAlexW2339797829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.