Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27079621›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2016

Experimental and computational micromechanics at the tibial cement-trabeculae interface.

Priyanka Srinivasan, Mark A Miller, Nico Verdonschot, Kenneth A Mann, Dennis Janssen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Similitude of cement-bone micromechanics in cemented rat and human knee replacement.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Mechanically Induced Periprosthetic Osteolysis: A Systematic Review.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Strain shielding in trabecular bone at the tibial cement-bone interface.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Priyanka SrinivasanRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: priyanka.srinivasan@radboudumc.nl.
Mark A MillerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Nico VerdonschotRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; University of Twente, Laboratory for Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Kenneth A MannDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Dennis JanssenRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

INTERFACE FAILURE IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENTSR01AR042017 · NIAMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MANN, KENNETH A. · 2001 to 2021
$6.3M
INTERFACE FAILURE IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENTSR29AR042017 · NIAMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MANN, KENNETH A. · 1996 to 2000
$68k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR042017NIAMS NIH HHS R29 AR042017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aseptic loosening of the tibial component in cemented total knee arthroplasty remains a major concern. We hypothesize that micromotion between the cement and trabeculae leads to increased circulation of interstitial fluid which in turn causes fluid-induced resorption of the trabeculae. Another mechanism for implant loosening is trabecular strain shielding. Using a newly developed experimental setup and digital image correlation (DIC) methods we were able to measure micromotion and strains in lab-prepared cement-trabeculae interface specimens (n=4). Finite element (FE) models of these specimens were developed to determine whether differences in micromotion and strain in morphologically varying specimens could be simulated accurately. Results showed that the measured micromotion and strains correlated well with FE model predictions (r(2)=0.59-0.85; r(2)=0.66-0.90). Global specimen strains measured axially matched well with the FE model strains (r(2)=0.87). FE model cement strains showed an increasing trend with distance from the cement border. The influence of loss of trabecular connectivity at the specimen edges was studied using our FE model results. Micromotion values at the outer edge of the specimens were higher than the specimen interior when considering a very thin outer edge (0.1mm). When the outer edge thickness was increased to about one trabecular length (0.8mm), there was a drop in the median and peak values. Using the experimental and modelling approach outlined in this study, we can further study the mechanisms that lead to loss of interlock between cement and trabeculae at the tibial interface.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone CementsAdultAged, 80 and overFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleModels, BiologicalStress, MechanicalTibiaX-Ray MicrotomographyBone CementsAseptic looseningBone-cement interfaceDigital image correlationFinite element analysisMicromotion

Identifiers

PMID27079621
PMCPMC4885794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.