Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27079512›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2016

The reduction of birth weight by fine particulate matter and its modification by maternal and neighbourhood-level factors: a multilevel analysis in British Columbia, Canada.

Anders C Erickson, Aleck Ostry, Laurie H M Chan, Laura Arbour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Low birth weight and PMEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anders C EricksonDivision of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Medical Science Bld. Rm-104, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, V8W 2Y2, BC, Canada.
Aleck OstryDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, David Turpin Bldg. Rm-B203, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, V8W 2Y2, BC, Canada.
Laurie H M ChanCenter for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, University of Ottawa, 20 Marie-Curie, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, ON, Canada.
Laura ArbourDivision of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Medical Science Bld. Rm-104, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, V8W 2Y2, BC, Canada. larbour@uvic.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this research was to determine the relationship between modeled particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and birth weight, including the potential modification by maternal risk factors and indicators of socioeconomic status (SES).

methodsBirth records from 2001 to 2006 (N = 231,929) were linked to modeled PM2.5 data from a national land-use regression model along with neighbourhood-level SES and socio-demographic data using 6-digit residential postal codes. Multilevel random coefficient models were used to estimate the effects of PM2.5, SES and other individual and neighbourhood-level covariates on continuous birth weight and test interactions. Gestational age was modeled with a random slope to assess potential neighbourhood-level differences of its effect on birth weight and whether any between-neighbourhood variability can be explained by cross-level interactions.

resultsModels adjusted for individual and neighbourhood-level covariates showed a significant non-linear negative association between PM2.5 and birth weight explaining 8.5 % of the between-neighbourhood differences in mean birth weight. A significant interaction between SES and PM2.5 was observed, revealing a more pronounced negative effect of PM2.5 on birth weight in lower SES neighbourhoods. Further positive and negative modification of the PM2.5 effect was observed with maternal smoking, maternal age, gestational diabetes, and suspected maternal drug or alcohol use. The random intercept variance indicating between-neighbourhood birth weight differences was reduced by 75 % in the final model, while the random slope variance for between-neighbourhood gestational age effects remained virtually unchanged.

conclusionWe provide evidence that neighbourhood-level SES variables and PM2.5 have both independent and interacting associations with birth weight, and together account for 49 % of the between-neighbourhood differences in birth weight. Evidence of effect modification of PM2.5 on birth weight across various maternal and neighbourhood-level factors suggests that certain sub-populations may be more or less vulnerable to relatively low doses PM2.5 exposure.

Indexed as

Birth WeightModels, TheoreticalAdolescentAdultAir PollutantsBritish ColumbiaChildFemaleHumansMaternal ExposureMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisParticulate MatterPregnancyResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsAir PollutantsParticulate MatterAir pollutionBirth weightEffect modificationMultilevel modelNeighbourhood effectsParticulate matterSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID27079512
PMCPMC4831087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.