ArticleScientific reports2016
Differential neural mechanisms for early and late prediction error detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive investigation of predictive processing: A cross- and within-cognitive domains fMRI meta-analytic approach.Human brain mapping · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Statistical Learning of Incidental Perceptual Regularities Induces Sensory Conditioned Cortical Responses.Biology · 2024Article
- Graph analysis of cortical reorganization after virtual reality-based rehabilitation following stroke: a pilot randomized study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Disentangling predictive processing in the brain: a meta-analytic study in favour of a predictive network.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Brodmann area 10: Collating, integrating and high level processing of nociception and pain.Progress in neurobiology · 2018Review
- Synthetic consciousness: the distributed adaptive control perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence indicates that prediction, instantiated at different perceptual levels, facilitate visual processing and enable prompt and appropriate reactions. Until now, the mechanisms underlying the effect of predictive coding at different stages of visual processing have still remained unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate early and late processing of spatial prediction violation by performing combined recordings of saccadic eye movements and fast event-related fMRI during a continuous visual detection task. Psychophysical reverse correlation analysis revealed that the degree of mismatch between current perceptual input and prior expectations is mainly processed at late rather than early stage, which is instead responsible for fast but general prediction error detection. Furthermore, our results suggest that conscious late detection of deviant stimuli is elicited by the assessment of prediction error's extent more than by prediction error per se. Functional MRI and functional connectivity data analyses indicated that higher-level brain systems interactions modulate conscious detection of prediction error through top-down processes for the analysis of its representational content, and possibly regulate subsequent adaptation of predictive models. Overall, our experimental paradigm allowed to dissect explicit from implicit behavioral and neural responses to deviant stimuli in terms of their reliance on predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.