ArticleTrials2016
When are clinical trials registered? An analysis of prospective versus retrospective registration.
Article in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Towards full clinical trial registration and results publication: longitudinal meta-research study in Northwestern and Central Switzerland.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of comorbid personality disorders on psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2021Pooled it
- Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Assessment of Selective Reporting Biases in Studies Included in Campbell Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Misreporting of Patient-Relevant and Study Design Elements in Anesthesiology Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Characteristics of phase 4 clinical trials on Dental Caries registered at Clinicaltrials.gov.BMC oral health · 2025Review
- Impact of selective reporting bias on stroke trials: potential compromise in evidence synthesis - A cross-sectional study.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Article
- Increasing Value and Reducing Waste of Research on Neurofeedback Effects in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A State-of-the-Art-Review.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2024Review
- Clinical trial registries: The good, and the not so good.Journal of biosciences · 2024Article
- The effect of virtual reality on cognitive, affective, and psychomotor outcomes in nursing staffs: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Reporting of retrospective registration in clinical trial publications: a cross-sectional study of German trials.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Comparing the Effects of Differential and Visuo-Motor Training on Functional Performance, Biomechanical, and Psychological Factors in Athletes after ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Big little lies: a compendium and simulation ofRoyal Society open science · 2023Article
- Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of registered clinical trials on the use of particle beam radiation therapy in head and neck cancers.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Quality assessment and its influencing factors of lung cancer clinical research registration: a cross-sectional analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- regCOVID: Tracking publications of registered COVID-19 studies.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Nonregistration, discontinuation, and nonpublication of randomized trials: A repeated metaresearch analysis.PLoS medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to problems of publication bias and selective reporting, the ICMJE requires prospective registration of all clinical trials with an appropriate registry before the first participant is enrolled. Previous research has shown that not all clinical trials are registered at this time (prospectively). This study investigated the extent and timing of trial registration. The aims were to determine 1) the proportion of clinical trials that were registered prospectively or retrospectively and 2) when retrospective registration took place in relation to submission to the journal in which they were published.
methodsAll clinical trials published in the BMC series in 2013 were identified. All articles that met the study's inclusion criteria were categorised into one of three categories: 1) prospectively registered, 2) retrospectively registered before submission to the journal in which they were published or 3) retrospectively registered after submission to the journal in which they were published.
resultsOne hundred and eight eligible studies were identified. Of these, 33 (31 %) reported studies that were registered prospectively, 72 reported studies that were registered retrospectively (67 %) and three articles (3 %) did not include a trial registration number. Of the 72 studies that were registered retrospectively, 66 (92 %) were registered before the article was submitted to the journal and six (8 %) were registered after the article was submitted to the journal.
conclusionsTen years after the ICMJE requirements for prospective registration of clinical trials this study found that the majority of included clinical trials were registered retrospectively but before submission to a journal for publication. This highlights the need for organisations other than journals, such as research institutions and grant giving bodies, to be more involved in enforcing prospective trial registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.