Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27079367›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Brain Perfusion Imaging in Neonates: An Overview.

M Proisy, S Mitra, C Uria-Avellana, M Sokolska, N J Robertson, F Le Jeune, J-C Ferré

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Neuromonitoring in the neonatal ECMO patient.Seminars in perinatology · 2018
    Review
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M ProisyFrom the Department of Radiology (M.P., J.-C.F.), Rennes University Hospital, France maia.proisy@chu-rennes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3106-5627
S MitraDepartment of Neonatology (M.P., S.M., C.U.-A., N.J.R.), University College London Hospital, Institute for Women's Health, University College of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4304-4594
C Uria-AvellanaDepartment of Neonatology (M.P., S.M., C.U.-A., N.J.R.), University College London Hospital, Institute for Women's Health, University College of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-3559
M SokolskaInstitute of Neurology (M.S.), University College of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-5263
N J RobertsonDepartment of Neonatology (M.P., S.M., C.U.-A., N.J.R.), University College London Hospital, Institute for Women's Health, University College of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5783-0828
F Le JeuneDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (F.L.J.), Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6809-7265
J-C FerréFrom the Department of Radiology (M.P., J.-C.F.), Rennes University Hospital, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-1800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of cognitive function in children has been related to a regional metabolic increase and an increase in regional brain perfusion. Moreover, brain perfusion plays an important role in the pathogenesis of brain damage in high-risk neonates, both preterm and full-term asphyxiated infants. In this article, we will review and discuss several existing imaging techniques for assessing neonatal brain perfusion.

Identifiers

PMID27079367
PMCPMC7960464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.