Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27078679›Full record

ReviewAssay and drug development technologies2016

Avoiding Fluorescence Assay Interference-The Case for Diaphorase.

Matthew D Hall, Anton Simeonov, Mindy I Davis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Assay and drug development technologies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent progress on micro- and nano-robots: towardsQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Diaphorase Coupling Protocols for Red-Shifting Dehydrogenase Assays.Assay and drug development technologies · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew D HallNCATS Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Rockville, Maryland.
Anton SimeonovNCATS Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Rockville, Maryland.
Mindy I DavisNCATS Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Rockville, Maryland.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence is utilized as the output for a range of assay formats used in high-throughput screening (HTS). Interference with these assays from the compounds in libraries utilized in HTS is a well-recognized phenomenon, particularly for assays relying on UV excitation such as for direct detection of the oxidoreductase cofactors NADH or NADPH. In this study, we discuss these interference challenges and highlight the specific case of the diaphorase/resazurin system that can be coupled to enzymes utilizing NADH or NADPH. We review the utilization of this assay system in the literature and argue that the diaphorase/resazurin system is underutilized in assay development. It is the authors' hope that this Perspective and the accompanying Technical Brief in this issue will stimulate interest in a robust and sensitive coupling system to avoid assay fluorescence interference.

Indexed as

ArtifactsFluorescenceNADNADPNADPH DehydrogenaseOxazinesSpectrometry, FluorescenceXanthenesNADNADPNADPH DehydrogenaseOxazinesresazurinXanthenes

Identifiers

PMID27078679
PMCPMC4840916
OpenAlexW2343328787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.