Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27078146›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Development of a Short Version of MSQOL-54 Using Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory.

Rosalba Rosato, Silvia Testa, Antonio Bertolotto, Paolo Confalonieri, Francesco Patti, Alessandra Lugaresi, Maria Grazia Grasso, Anna Toscano, Andrea Giordano, Alessandra Solari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Psychometrics, diagnostics and usability of Italian tools assessing behavioural and functional outcomes in neurological, geriatric and psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceived health- related quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis with and without a vascular comorbidity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A composite measure for patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care: design principles and validity checks.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Semi-automated Rasch analysis using in-plus-out-of-questionnaire log likelihood.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing measurement invariance of MSQOL-54 across Italian and English versions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  15. Multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rosalba RosatoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Silvia TestaDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Antonio BertolottoClinical Neurobiology Unit, Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre (CReSM), University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.
Paolo ConfalonieriUnit of Neuroimmunology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Francesco PattiMS Centre, Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy.
Alessandra LugaresiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Maria Grazia GrassoMultiple Sclerosis Unit, IRCCS S. Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Anna ToscanoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Andrea GiordanoUnit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra SolariUnit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQOL-54, 52 items grouped in 12 subscales plus two single items) is the most used MS specific health related quality of life inventory.

objectiveTo develop a shortened version of the MSQOL-54.

methodsMSQOL-54 dimensionality and metric properties were investigated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch modelling (Partial Credit Model, PCM) on MSQOL-54s completed by 473 MS patients. Their mean age was 41 years, 65% were women, and median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.0 (range 0-9.5). Differential item functioning (DIF) was evaluated for gender, age and EDSS. Dimensionality of the resulting short version was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and CFA. Cognitive debriefing of the short instrument (vs. the original) was then performed on 12 MS patients.

resultsCFA of MSQOL-54 subscales showed that the data fitted the overall model well. Two subscales (Role Limitations--Physical, Role Limitations--Emotional) did not fit the PCM, and were removed; two other subscales (Health Perceptions, Social Function) did not fit the model, but were retained as single items. Sexual Satisfaction (single-item subscale) was also removed. The resulting MSQOL-29 consisted of 25 items grouped in 7 subscales, plus 4 single items. PCM fit statistics were within the acceptability range for all MSQOL-29 items except one which had significant DIF by age. EFA and CFA indicated adequate fit to the original two-factor (Physical and Mental Health Composites) hypothesis. Cognitive debriefing confirmed that MSQOL-29 was acceptable and had lost no key items.

conclusionsThe proposed MSQOL-29 is 50% shorter than MSQOL-54, yet preserves key quality of life dimensions. Prospective validation on a large, independent MS patient sample is ongoing.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedCognitionDisability EvaluationFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisProspective StudiesPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID27078146
PMCPMC4831784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.