Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27078118›Full record

ArticleNanomedicine (London, England)2016

Evaluation of expansile nanoparticle tumor localization and efficacy in a cancer stem cell-derived model of pancreatic peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Victoria Lm Herrera, Aaron H Colby, Glaiza Al Tan, Ann M Moran, Michael J O'Brien, Yolonda L Colson, Nelson Ruiz-Opazo, Mark W Grinstaff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pilot-scale production of expansile nanoparticles: Practical methods for clinical scale-up.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Tumor-mesoporous silica nanoparticle interactions following intraperitoneal delivery for targeting peritoneal metastasis.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fluorescence-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy.Annals of laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria Lm HerreraDepartment of Medicine & Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Aaron H ColbyDepartments of Biomedical Engineering & Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Glaiza Al TanDepartment of Medicine & Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Ann M MoranDepartment of Medicine & Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Michael J O'BrienDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Yolonda L ColsonDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Nelson Ruiz-OpazoDepartment of Medicine & Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Mark W GrinstaffDepartment of Medicine & Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Boston University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Boston University Cross-Disciplinary Training in Nanotechnology for CancerR25CA153955 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FALLER, DOUGLAS V, GOLDBERG, BENNETT B · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA153955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the tumor localization and efficacy pH-responsive expansile nanoparticles (eNPs) as a drug delivery system for pancreatic peritoneal carcinomatosis (PPC) modeled in nude rats. METHODS & MATERIALS: A Panc-1-cancer stem cell xeno1graft model of PPC was validated in vitro and in vivo. Tumor localization was tracked via in situ imaging of fluorescent eNPs. Survival of animals treated with paclitaxel-loaded eNPs (PTX-eNPs) was evaluated in vivo.

resultsThe Panc-1-cancer stem cell xenograft model recapitulates significant features of PPC. Rhodamine-labeled eNPs demonstrate tumor-specific, dose- and time-dependent localization to macro- and microscopic tumors following intraperitoneal injection. PTX-eNPs are as effective as free PTX in treating established PPC; but, PTX-eNPs result in fewer side effects.

conclusioneNPs are a promising tool for the detection and treatment of PPC.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsCarcinomaDisease Models, AnimalHumansNanoparticlesNeoplastic Stem CellsPaclitaxelPancreatic NeoplasmsPeritoneumRatsRhodaminesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysPaclitaxelRhodaminescancer stem cellsexpansile nanoparticlepaclitaxelpancreatic carcinomatosistumor localization

Identifiers

PMID27078118
PMCPMC4910944
OpenAlexW2338229586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.