Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27077731›Full record

ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2016

Performance of DWI as a Rapid Unenhanced Technique for Detecting Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Elevated-Risk Women With Dense Breasts.

Elizabeth S McDonald, Jill A Hammersley, Shinn-Huey S Chou, Habib Rahbar, John R Scheel, Christoph I Lee, Cheng-Liang Liu, Constance D Lehman, Savannah C Partridge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Utility of Echo-planar Imaging with Compressed Sensitivity Encoding (EPICS) in the Evaluation of Small Breast Cancers Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Background Suppression (DWIBS).Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Occult breast cancer in an older woman: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth S McDonald1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Jill A Hammersley1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Shinn-Huey S Chou1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Habib Rahbar1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
John R Scheel1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Christoph I Lee1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Cheng-Liang Liu1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Constance D Lehman1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Savannah C Partridge1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Rm G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance · US

Funding

MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Detection and Characterization of Breast LesionsR01CA151326 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARTRIDGE, SAVANNAH CORRINA · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of DWI to detect mammographically occult breast cancer in elevated-risk women with dense breasts. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all women who underwent screening breast MRI at our institution from January 2007 through May 2013. We created a case-control cohort composed of 48 subjects with mammographically dense breasts: 24 with mammographically occult cancer detected on MRI and 24 healthy women with negative MRI findings who were matched to the subjects with breast cancer patients for age, breast density, and MRI protocol. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and conspicuity score (range, 1-5) were assessed on DWI for all malignancies. Lesions and normal tissue were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test; associations with clinical characteristics were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Three experienced breast imagers who were blinded to medical records and contrast-enhanced MRI findings independently evaluated the unenhanced MRI scans of the 48 women for the presence of cancer.

resultsMammographically occult breast cancers (invasive carcinoma, n = 16; ductal carcinoma in situ, n = 8) in women with dense breasts typically exhibited higher signal intensity on DWI than normal parenchyma (median CNR of cancers, 1.4; median conspicuity score of cancers, 4) and a lower ADC (median, 1.31 vs 1.79 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The conspicuity score, CNR, and ADC were not associated with patient age, menopausal status, lesion size, morphologic type, or histology (p > 0.05). Average reader performance using unenhanced MRI was 45% sensitivity, 91% specificity, 62% positive predictive value, and 83% negative predictive value.

conclusionIn elevated-risk women with dense breasts, DWI can reveal cancers in addition to those detected on mammography alone with a low false-positive rate; these results suggest that DWI may have potential as a rapid supplemental screening tool.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesClinical CompetenceContrast MediaFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Mediabreast cancer screeningcancer detectiondense breastsDWImammographically occult cancerMRIreader performance

Identifiers

PMID27077731
PMCPMC7932756
OpenAlexW2337042500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.