Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27077679›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2016

Rapid evolution of the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Julie M Collet, Sara Fuentes, Jack Hesketh, Mark S Hill, Paolo Innocenti, Edward H Morrow, Kevin Fowler, Max Reuter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adaptation to a bacterial pathogen inEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ecology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  13. Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Building a new research framework for social evolution: intralocus caste antagonism.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julie M ColletResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sara FuentesResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jack HeskethResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark S HillResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paolo InnocentiDepartment of Animal Ecology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Edward H MorrowDepartment of Animal Ecology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kevin FowlerResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Max ReuterResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom. m.reuter@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council NE/G019452/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual antagonism (SA) arises when male and female phenotypes are under opposing selection, yet genetically correlated. Until resolved, antagonism limits evolution toward optimal sex-specific phenotypes. Despite its importance for sex-specific adaptation and existing theory, the dynamics of SA resolution are not well understood empirically. Here, we present data from Drosophila melanogaster, compatible with a resolution of SA. We compared two independent replicates of the "LHM " population in which SA had previously been described. Both had been maintained under identical, controlled conditions, and separated for around 200 generations. Although heritabilities of male and female fitness were similar, the intersexual genetic correlation differed significantly, being negative in one replicate (indicating SA) but close to zero in the other. Using population sequencing, we show that phenotypic differences were associated with population divergence in allele frequencies at nonrandom loci across the genome. Large frequency changes were more prevalent in the population without SA and were enriched at loci mapping to genes previously shown to have sexually antagonistic relationships between expression and fitness. Our data suggest that rapid evolution toward SA resolution has occurred in one of the populations and open avenues toward studying the genetics of SA and its resolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic FitnessSex CharacteristicsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationMalePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAAdaptationevolutionary genomicsfitnesspopulation geneticsquantitative geneticssexual conflict

Identifiers

PMID27077679
PMCPMC5069644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.