Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27077332›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.

Stefano Forli, Ruth Huey, Michael E Pique, Michel F Sanner, David S Goodsell, Arthur J Olson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,013 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,013citing papers in PubMed
91.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,013 citing papers in PubMed, 2,604 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PockLigGPT: Pocket-Sequence-Conditioned Molecular Generation with GPTs and RL.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

953 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefano ForliDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-7111
Ruth HueyDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Michael E PiqueDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Michel F SannerDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
David S GoodsellDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Arthur J OlsonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

AutoDock Suite: Next Generation Environment for Drug DesignR01GM069832 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI FORLI, STEFANO · 2004 to 2025
$10.9M
In-silico prediction of protein-peptide interactions.R01GM096888 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SANNER, MICHEL F. · 2011 to 2023
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069832NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational docking can be used to predict bound conformations and free energies of binding for small-molecule ligands to macromolecular targets. Docking is widely used for the study of biomolecular interactions and mechanisms, and it is applied to structure-based drug design. The methods are fast enough to allow virtual screening of ligand libraries containing tens of thousands of compounds. This protocol covers the docking and virtual screening methods provided by the AutoDock suite of programs, including a basic docking of a drug molecule with an anticancer target, a virtual screen of this target with a small ligand library, docking with selective receptor flexibility, active site prediction and docking with explicit hydration. The entire protocol will require ∼5 h.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationCatalytic DomainDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalLigandsProteinsSoftwareStructure-Activity RelationshipUser-Computer InterfaceLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID27077332
PMCPMC4868550
OpenAlexW2336040088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.