Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27077121›Full record

Trial reportEBioMedicine2016

Safety and Upper Respiratory Pharmacokinetics of the Hemagglutinin Stalk-Binding Antibody VIS410 Support Treatment and Prophylaxis Based on Population Modeling of Seasonal Influenza A Outbreaks.

Andrew M Wollacott, Maciej F Boni, Kristy J Szretter, Susan E Sloan, Mona Yousofshahi, Karthik Viswanathan, Sylvain Bedard, Catherine A Hay, Patrick F Smith, Zachary Shriver and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02045472 (Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Phase 1 Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Human Monoclonal Antibody), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02045472 phase1completednot on this map

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Phase 1 Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Human Monoclonal Antibody (VIS410) to Influenza Type A Hemagglutinin

TypeinterventionalSponsorVisterra, Inc.Ran2014 to 2015Enrolled41ConditionsInfluenzaArmsVIS410, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Safety and Efficacy of CR6261 in an Influenza A H1N1 Healthy Human Challenge Model.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Monoclonal Antibodies and Hyperimmune Immunoglobulins in the Next Pandemic.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antiviral Approaches against Influenza Virus.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Destabilization of the human RED-SMU1 splicing complex as a basis for host-directed antiinfluenza strategy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew M WollacottVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Maciej F BoniOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kristy J SzretterVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Susan E SloanVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Mona YousofshahiVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Karthik ViswanathanVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Sylvain BedardVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Catherine A HayVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Patrick F Smithd3 Medicine LLC, Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Zachary ShriverVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Jose M TrevejoVisterra Inc., One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Visterra (United States) · USOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNReckitt Benckiser (United States) · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal influenza is a major public health concern in vulnerable populations. Here we investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody (VIS410) against Influenza A in a Phase 1 clinical trial. Based on these results and preclinical data, we implemented a mathematical modeling approach to investigate whether VIS410 could be used prophylactically to lessen the burden of a seasonal influenza epidemic and to protect at-risk groups from associated complications.

methodsUsing a single-ascending dose study (n = 41) at dose levels from 2 mg/kg-50 mg/kg we evaluated the safety as well as the serum and upper respiratory pharmacokinetics of a broadly-neutralizing antibody (VIS410) against influenza A (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02045472). Our primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of VIS410 compared to placebo. We developed an epidemic microsimulation model testing the ability of VIS410 to mitigate attack rates and severe disease in at risk-populations.

findingsVIS410 was found to be generally safe and well-tolerated at all dose levels, from 2-50 mg/kg. Overall, 27 of 41 subjects (65.9%) reported a total of 67 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs were reported by 20 of 30 subjects (66.7%) who received VIS410 and by 7 of 11 subjects (63.6%) who received placebo. 14 of 16 TEAEs related to study drug were considered mild (Grade 1) and 2 were moderate (Grade 2). Two subjects (1 subject who received 30 mg/kg VIS410 and 1 subject who received placebo) experienced serious AEs (Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs) that were not related to study drug. VIS410 exposure was approximately dose-proportional with a mean half-life of 12.9 days. Mean VIS410 Cmax levels in the upper respiratory tract were 20.0 and 25.3 μg/ml at the 30 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg doses, respectively, with corresponding serum Cmax levels of 980.5 and 1316 μg/mL. Using these pharmacokinetic data, a microsimulation model showed that median attack rate reductions ranged from 8.6% (interquartile range (IQR): 4.7%-11.0%) for 2% coverage to 22.6% (IQR: 12.7-30.0%) for 6% coverage. The overall benefits to the elderly, a vulnerable subgroup, are largest when VIS410 is distributed exclusively to elderly individuals, resulting in reductions in hospitalization rates between 11.4% (IQR: 8.2%-13.3%) for 2% coverage and 30.9% (IQR: 24.8%-35.1%) for 6% coverage among those more than 65 years of age.

interpretationVIS410 was generally safe and well tolerated and had good relative exposure in both serum and upper respiratory tract, supporting its use as either a single-dose therapeutic or prophylactic for influenza A. Including VIS410 prophylaxis among the public health interventions for seasonal influenza has the potential to lower attack rates and substantially reduce hospitalizations in individuals over the age of 65.

fundingVisterra, Inc.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesDisease OutbreaksDrug EvaluationFemaleHemagglutininsHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedSeasonsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesHemagglutininsVIS410 monoclonal antibodyEpidemic modelingInfluenzaMonoclonal antibodyProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID27077121
PMCPMC4816807
OpenAlexW2273814915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.