ArticlePeerJ2016
Differences in stability of seed-associated microbial assemblages in response to invasion by phytopathogenic microorganisms.
Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on the changes in the microbiome before and after seed embryo after-ripening ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The type VI secretion system of Stenotrophomonas rhizophila CFBP13503 limits the transmission of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris 8004 from radish seeds to seedlings.Molecular plant pathology · 2024Article
- Human vaginal microbiota colonization is regulated by female sex hormones in a mouse model.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Australian native Glycine clandestina seed microbiota hosts a more diverse bacterial community than the domesticated soybean Glycine max.Environmental microbiome · 2022Article
- Dynamic Fluctuation and Niche Differentiation of Fungal Pathogens Infecting Bell Pepper Plants.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Microbiome Research as an Effective Driver of Success Stories in Agrifood Systems - A Selection of Case Studies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Microbiome Modulation-Toward a Better Understanding of Plant Microbiome Response to Microbial Inoculants.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Seed Banks as Incidental Fungi Banks: Fungal Endophyte Diversity in Stored Seeds of Banana Wild Relatives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Temporal dynamics of bacterial communities during seed development and maturation.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2020Article
- Populations of the Parasitic PlantFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Seeds of native alpine plants host unique microbial communities embedded in cross-kingdom networks.Microbiome · 2019Article
- Differences in resource use lead to coexistence of seed-transmitted microbial populations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere and endosphere of tomato plants.PloS one · 2019Article
- High-throughput identification and diagnostics of pathogens and pests: Overview and practical recommendations.Molecular ecology resources · 2019Review
- In situ relationships between microbiota and potential pathobiota in Arabidopsis thaliana.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont.Microbiome · 2018Review
- Genome Sequence of the Necrotrophic Plant PathogenGenome announcements · 2018Article
- Functional Microbial Features Driving Community Assembly During Seed Germination and Emergence.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seeds are involved in the vertical transmission of microorganisms from one plant generation to another and consequently act as reservoirs for the plant microbiota. However, little is known about the structure of seed-associated microbial assemblages and the regulators of assemblage structure. In this work, we have assessed the response of seed-associated microbial assemblages of Raphanus sativus to invading phytopathogenic agents, the bacterial strain Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) 8004 and the fungal strain Alternaria brassicicola Abra43. According to the indicators of bacterial (16S rRNA gene and gyrB sequences) and fungal (ITS1) diversity employed in this study, seed transmission of the bacterial strain Xcc 8004 did not change the overall composition of resident microbial assemblages. In contrast seed transmission of Abra43 strongly modified the richness and structure of fungal assemblages without affecting bacterial assemblages. The sensitivity of seed-associated fungal assemblage to Abra43 is mostly related to changes in relative abundance of closely related fungal species that belong to the Alternaria genus. Variation in stability of the seed microbiota in response to Xcc and Abra43 invasions could be explained by differences in seed transmission pathways employed by these micro-organisms, which ultimately results in divergence in spatio-temporal colonization of the seed habitat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.