Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076994›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2016

Stem Cells in Skin Wound Healing: Are We There Yet?

Mariana Teixeira Cerqueira, Rogério Pedro Pirraco, Alexandra Pinto Marques

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04134676 (Therapeutic Potential of Stem Cell Conditioned Medium on Chronic Ulcer Wounds), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04134676 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Potential of Stem Cell Conditioned Medium on Chronic Ulcer Wounds : Pilot Study in Human

TypeinterventionalSponsorSukma Skin TreatmentRan2019 to 2020Enrolled38ConditionsChronic UlcerArmsConditioned Media
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana Teixeira Cerqueira3B's Research Group-Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.; ICVS/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães, Portugal.
Rogério Pedro Pirraco3B's Research Group-Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.; ICVS/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães, Portugal.
Alexandra Pinto Marques3B's Research Group-Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.; ICVS/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID27076994
PMCPMC4817598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.