Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076820›Full record

ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC2016

How do community pharmacists make decisions? Results of an exploratory qualitative study in Ontario.

Paul A M Gregory, Brenna Whyte, Zubin Austin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Communicating medication risk to cardiovascular patients in Qatar.International journal of health care quality assurance · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Barriers to pharmacy practice change: Is it our nature or nurture?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2016
    Article
  13. The immense value of qualitative research to pharmacy.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2016
    Article
  14. Professional identity in pharmacy: Opportunity, crisis or just another day at work?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Community pharmacist perceptions of drug-drug interactions.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Regulation and innovation in practice - Not a "drug interaction"?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  20. Professional abstinence: What does it mean for pharmacists?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Paul A M GregoryLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Brenna WhyteLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Zubin AustinLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
3M (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the complexity of pharmacy practice increases, pharmacists are required to make more decisions under ambiguous or information-deficient conditions. There is scant literature examining how pharmacists make decisions and what factors or values influence their choices. The objective of this exploratory research was to characterize decision-making patterns in the clinical setting of community pharmacists in Ontario.

methodsThe think-aloud decision-making method was used for this study. Community pharmacists with 3 or more years' experience were presented with 2 clinical case studies dealing with challenging situations and were asked to verbally reason through their decision-making process while being probed by an interviewer for clarification, justification and further explication. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using a protocol analysis method. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 12 pharmacists participated in this study. Participants experienced cognitive dissonance in attempting to reconcile their desire for a clear and confrontation-free conclusion to the case discussion and the reality of the challenge presented within each case. Strategies for resolving this cognitive dissonance included strong emphasis on the educational (rather than decision-making) role of the pharmacist, the value of strong interpersonal relationships as a way to avoid conflict and achieve desired outcomes, the desire to seek external advice or defer to others' authority to avoid making a decision and the use of strict interpretations of rules to avoid ambiguity and contextual interpretation. This research was neither representative nor generalizable but was indicative of patterns of decisional avoidance and fear of assuming responsibility for outcomes that warrant further investigation.

conclusionThe think-aloud method functioned effectively in this context and provided insights into pharmacists' decision-making patterns in the clinical setting. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2016;149:90-98.

Identifiers

PMID27076820
PMCPMC4813515
OpenAlexW2278007292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.