ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2016
Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing the knowledge and library services researcher: A pilot project.Health information and libraries journal · 2025Article
- MLA Research Training Institute (RTI) 2018 and 2019: participant research confidence and program effectiveness.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2024Article
- Mapping the health science librarianship research field in 2012-2022.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2022Article
- Health sciences and medical librarians conducting research and their experiences asking for co-authorship.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- Interlibrary loan and document delivery in North American health sciences libraries during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- The publication fate of abstracts presented at the Medical Library Association conferences.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- 5335 days of Implementation Science: using natural language processing to examine publication trends and topics.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- What we talk about when we talk about medical librarianship: an analysis of Medical Library Association annual meeting abstracts, 2001-2019.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2020Article
- Article
- Building visualization skills through investigating theJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2020Article
- Enhancing the research and publication efforts of health sciences librarians via an academic writing retreat.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017Article
- Let's get a stronger evidence base for our decisions.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016Article
- Fast five survey results and response.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016Article
- Research survey suggests opportunities.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation.
methodsAn online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized open-ended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson's chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments.
resultsAnalysis showed that 79% of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58% applied published research studies to practice; 44% had conducted research; 62% reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38% had presented findings; and 34% had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described.
conclusionsFindings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.