Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076808›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2016

Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes.

Susan Lessick, Carol Perryman, Brooke L Billman, Kristine M Alpi, Sandra L De Groote, Ted D Babin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mapping the health science librarianship research field in 2012-2022.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Building visualization skills through investigating theJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Let's get a stronger evidence base for our decisions.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016
    Article
  13. Fast five survey results and response.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016
    Article
  14. Research survey suggests opportunities.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan Lessick
Carol Perryman
Brooke L Billman
Kristine M Alpi
Sandra L De Groote
Ted D Babin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation.

methodsAn online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized open-ended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson's chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments.

resultsAnalysis showed that 79% of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58% applied published research studies to practice; 44% had conducted research; 62% reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38% had presented findings; and 34% had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described.

conclusionsFindings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth EducationHumansLibrariansLibraries, MedicalLibrary AssociationsLibrary ServicesProfessional CompetenceLibraries, MedicalLibrary Science ResearchLibrary SurveysResearch Report

Identifiers

PMID27076808
PMCPMC4816469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.