Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076661›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Multicenter Evaluation of Whole-Blood Epstein-Barr Viral Load Standardization Using the WHO International Standard.

Touyana Semenova, Julien Lupo, Sophie Alain, Gwladys Perrin-Confort, Laurence Grossi, Julie Dimier, Olivier Epaulard, Patrice Morand, Raphaële Germi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Prevention of OncogenicTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Immunosuppressive Agents and Infectious Risk in Transplantation: Managing the "Net State of Immunosuppression".Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Touyana SemenovaIBS, UMR 5075 CEA-CNRS-Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Julien LupoIBS, UMR 5075 CEA-CNRS-Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Sophie AlainDepartment of Virology, French National Cytomegalovirus Reference Center, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Gwladys Perrin-ConfortDepartment of Virology, Grenoble University Hospital, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Laurence GrossiIBS, UMR 5075 CEA-CNRS-Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Julie DimierIBS, UMR 5075 CEA-CNRS-Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Olivier EpaulardIBS, UMR 5075 CEA-CNRS-Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Patrice MorandIBS, UMR 5075 CEA-CNRS-Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Raphaële GermiIBS, UMR 5075 CEA-CNRS-Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France RGermi@chu-grenoble.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCEA Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInstitut de Biologie Structurale · FRUniversité de Limoges · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first WHO international standard for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (WHO EBV standard) for nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT)-based assays was commercialized in January 2012 by the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control. In the study reported here, we compared whole-blood EBV DNA load (EDL) results from 12 French laboratories for seven samples (Quality Controls for Molecular Diagnostics 2013 proficiency panel) in order to determine whether expression in international units reduces interlaboratory variability in whole-blood EDLs. Each testing laboratory used a conversion factor to convert EDL results from copies per milliliter to international units per milliliter. This conversion factor was calculated from the WHO EBV standard according to the protocol described in this study (nine laboratories) or the recommendations of the PCR kit suppliers (three laboratories). The interlaboratory variability in whole-blood EDL results was reduced after standardization of the results using the WHO EBV standard. For the seven samples tested, standard deviations (SD) ranged from 0.41 to 0.55 when the results were expressed in log copies per milliliter, whereas the SD ranged from 0.17 to 0.32 when results were given in log international units per milliliter. Comparing the variance data (F test), we showed that the dispersion of whole-blood EDL results was significantly lower when they were expressed in log international units per milliliter (P < 0.001 for six of seven samples and P < 0.05 for one sample with a low mean EDL of 2.62 log IU/ml). This study showed that the use of the WHO EBV standard could improve the homogeneity of whole-blood EDL results between laboratories as well as the monitoring of patients at high risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders or other EBV-associated diseases.

Indexed as

Reference StandardsBloodEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsFranceHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsViral LoadWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID27076661
PMCPMC4922081
OpenAlexW2338402453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.