Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076614›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2016

Tumor cell intravasation.

Serena P H Chiang, Ramon M Cabrera, Jeffrey E Segall

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of Pericyte-Mediated Cancer Metastasis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cancer Metastasis: Therapeutic Challenges and Opportunities.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Microfabricated Organ-Specific Models of Tumor Microenvironments.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serena P H ChiangAnatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Ramon M CabreraAnatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Jeffrey E SegallAnatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York jeffrey.segall@einstein.yu.edu.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Progression and MetastasisP01CA100324 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CONDEELIS, JOHN S · 2003 to 2018
$30.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA100324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of entering the bloodstream, intravasation, is a necessary step in the development of distant metastases. The focus of this review is on the pathways and molecules that have been identified as being important based on current in vitro and in vivo assays for intravasation. Properties of the vasculature which are important for intravasation include microvessel density and also diameter of the vasculature, with increased intravasation correlating with increased vessel diameter in some tumors. TGFB signaling can enhance intravasation at least in part through induction of EMT, and we discuss other TGFB target genes that are important for intravasation. In addition to TGFB signaling, a number of studies have demonstrated that activation of EGF receptor family members stimulates intravasation, with downstream signaling through PI3K, N-WASP, RhoA, and WASP to induce invadopodia. With respect to proteases, there is strong evidence for contributions by uPA/uPAR, while the roles of MMPs in intravasation may be more tumor specific. Other cells including macrophages, fibroblasts, neutrophils, and platelets can also play a role in enhancing tumor cell intravasation. The technology is now available to interrogate the expression patterns of circulating tumor cells, which will provide an important reality check for the model systems being used. With a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying intravasation, the goal is to provide new opportunities for improving prognosis as well as potentially developing new treatments.

Indexed as

Cell MovementNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenic ProteinsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMicrovesselsNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingSignal TransductionAngiogenic ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorangiogenesisEGFRintravasationmetastasisTGFBuPA

Identifiers

PMID27076614
PMCPMC4967137
OpenAlexW2340686113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.