Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076426›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

TARP γ-2 and γ-8 Differentially Control AMPAR Density Across Schaffer Collateral/Commissural Synapses in the Hippocampal CA1 Area.

Miwako Yamasaki, Masahiro Fukaya, Maya Yamazaki, Hirotsugu Azechi, Rie Natsume, Manabu Abe, Kenji Sakimura, Masahiko Watanabe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular and Anatomical Strengthening of "Winner" Climbing Fiber Synapses in Developing Mouse Purkinje Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differential nanoscale organization of excitatory synapses onto excitatory vs. inhibitory neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miwako YamasakiDepartment of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Masahiro FukayaDepartment of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan, Department of Anatomy, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan, and.
Maya YamazakiDepartment of Cellular Neurobiology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8585, Japan.
Hirotsugu AzechiDepartment of Cellular Neurobiology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8585, Japan.
Rie NatsumeDepartment of Cellular Neurobiology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8585, Japan.
Manabu AbeDepartment of Cellular Neurobiology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8585, Japan.
Kenji SakimuraDepartment of Cellular Neurobiology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8585, Japan.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan, watamasa@med.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5037-7138
Niigata University · JPHokkaido University · JPSapporo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) at synapses is the major determinant of synaptic strength and varies from synapse to synapse. To clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms, the density of AMPARs, PSD-95, and transmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins (TARPs) were compared at Schaffer collateral/commissural (SCC) synapses in the adult mouse hippocampal CA1 by quantitative immunogold electron microscopy using serial sections. We examined four types of SCC synapses: perforated and nonperforated synapses on pyramidal cells and axodendritic synapses on parvalbumin-positive (PV synapse) and pravalbumin-negative interneurons (non-PV synapse). SCC synapses were categorized into those expressing high-density (perforated and PV synapses) or low-density (nonperforated and non-PV synapses) AMPARs. Although the density of PSD-95 labeling was fairly constant, the density and composition of TARP isoforms was highly variable depending on the synapse type. Of the three TARPs expressed in hippocampal neurons, the disparity in TARP γ-2 labeling was closely related to that of AMPAR labeling. Importantly, AMPAR density was significantly reduced at perforated and PV synapses in TARP γ-2-knock-out (KO) mice, resulting in a virtual loss of AMPAR disparity among SCC synapses. In comparison, TARP γ-8 was the only TARP expressed at nonperforated synapses, where AMPAR labeling further decreased to a background level in TARP γ-8-KO mice. These results show that synaptic inclusion of TARP γ-2 potently increases AMPAR expression and transforms low-density synapses into high-density ones, whereas TARP γ-8 is essential for low-density or basal expression of AMPARs at nonperforated synapses. Therefore, these TARPs are critically involved in AMPAR density control at SCC synapses. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although converging evidence implicates the importance of transmembrane AMPA-type glutamate receptor (AMPAR) regulatory proteins (TARPs) in AMPAR stabilization during basal transmission and synaptic plasticity, how they control large disparities in AMPAR numbers or densities across central synapses remains largely unknown. We compared the density of AMPARs with that of TARPs among four types of Schaffer collateral/commissural (SCC) hippocampal synapses in wild-type and TARP-knock-out mice. We show that the density of AMPARs correlates with that of TARP γ-2 across SCC synapses and its high expression is linked to high-density AMPAR expression at perforated type of pyramidal cell synapses and synapses on parvalbumin-positive interneurons. In comparison, TARP γ-8 is the only TARP expressed at nonperforated type of pyramidal cell synapses, playing an essential role in low-density or basal AMPAR expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalCalcium ChannelsDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGuanylate KinasesMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPyramidal CellsReceptors, AMPARNA, MessengerSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionCacng2 protein, mouseCalcium ChannelsDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinDlg4 protein, mouseGuanylate KinasesMembrane ProteinsReceptors, AMPARNA, MessengerTARP gamma-8 protein, mouseAMPA receptorhippocampusinterneuronperforated synapsepyramidal celltransmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins

Identifiers

PMID27076426
PMCPMC6601775
OpenAlexW2336079051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.