Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076413›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Molecular fMRI.

Benjamin B Bartelle, Ali Barandov, Alan Jasanoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Probing nitric oxide signaling using molecular MRI.Free radical biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular fMRI of neurochemical signaling.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Imaging Guidance for Therapeutic Delivery: The Dawn of Neuroenergetics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The State of the NIH BRAIN Initiative.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Probing the brain with molecular fMRI.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Human Genomic Signatures of Brain Oscillations During Memory Encoding.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin B BartelleDepartments of Biological Engineering.
Ali BarandovDepartments of Biological Engineering.
Alan JasanoffDepartments of Biological Engineering, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, and Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 jasanoff@mit.edu.

Funding

Calcium sensors for molecular fMRIU01NS090451 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JASANOFF, ALAN · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
Amino acid neurotransmitter sensors for MRIR21MH102470 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JASANOFF, ALAN · 2013 to 2014
$415k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH102470NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH102470NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090451NINDS NIH HHS U01-NS090451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive analysis of brain function depends on understanding the dynamics of diverse neural signaling processes over large tissue volumes in intact animals and humans. Most existing approaches to measuring brain signaling suffer from limited tissue penetration, poor resolution, or lack of specificity for well-defined neural events. Here we discuss a new brain activity mapping method that overcomes some of these problems by combining MRI with contrast agents sensitive to neural signaling. The goal of this "molecular fMRI" approach is to permit noninvasive whole-brain neuroimaging with specificity and resolution approaching current optical neuroimaging methods. In this article, we describe the context and need for molecular fMRI as well as the state of the technology today. We explain how major types of MRI probes work and how they can be sensitized to neurobiological processes, such as neurotransmitter release, calcium signaling, and gene expression changes. We comment both on past work in the field and on challenges and promising avenues for future development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Brain researchers currently have a choice between measuring neural activity using cellular-level recording techniques, such as electrophysiology and optical imaging, or whole-brain imaging methods, such as fMRI. Cellular level methods are precise but only address a small portion of mammalian brains; on the other hand, whole-brain neuroimaging techniques provide very little specificity for neural pathways or signaling components of interest. The molecular fMRI techniques we discuss have particular potential to combine the specificity of cellular-level measurements with the noninvasive whole-brain coverage of fMRI. On the other hand, molecular fMRI is only just getting off the ground. This article aims to offer a snapshot of the status and future prospects for development of molecular fMRI techniques.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMolecular ImagingContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID27076413
PMCPMC4829642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.