Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2707638›Full record

Trial reportGut1989

Effect of calcium supplementation on mucosal cell proliferation in high risk patients for colon cancer.

R C Gregoire, H S Stern, K S Yeung, J Stadler, S Langley, R Furrer, W R Bruce

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Colon cancer: polyps, prevention, and politics.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 1998
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gastroenterology.Postgraduate medical journal · 1990
    Review
  15. Short-term tests and long-term prospects for colon cancer prevention.Medical oncology and tumor pharmacotherapy · 1990
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R C GregoireLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto Branch, Ontario, Canada.
H S Stern
K S Yeung
J Stadler
S Langley
R Furrer
W R Bruce
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CALudwig Cancer Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that supplemental calcium could lower the abnormally high proliferation rate found in the colonic mucosa of subjects at high risk for colon cancer. In this double blind controlled study, this effect in volunteers previously operated upon for a colorectal adenocarcinoma was tested. Thirty subjects were randomised to receive either elemental calcium 1200 mg/day or a placebo. Mucosal proliferation was measured with tritiated thymidine labelling before and after the 30 day intervention period. Diets, faecal pH and the concentration of calcium and bile acids in the aqueous phase of feaces were also measured. Labelling index did not differ significantly in the two groups before intervention (placebo 4.0(2.4) v calcium 4.9(2.9), but the difference approached significance afterwards (4.4(2.4) v 6.5(3.4), p = 0.06). Individual changes occurring with intervention were tabulated and comparison of the means for the groups was not significant (delta = 0.3 vs delta = 1.8, p = 0.11). Calcium concentration, faecal pH and deoxycholic acid concentration increased in the calcium group (p = 0.02, 0.005 and 0.004 respectively). Calcium does not show any effect in decreasing colonic mucosal proliferation in this high risk group for colon cancer; it may increase faecal pH and the production of deoxycholic acid in the colon.

Indexed as

AgedBile Acids and SaltsCalciumCell DivisionColonColonic NeoplasmsDeoxycholic AcidDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntestinal MucosaMaleRandom AllocationRisk FactorsBile Acids and SaltsCalciumDeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID2707638
PMCPMC1378462
OpenAlexW2032276880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.