Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076350›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2016

Long-term outcomes in treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas: A 15 year single-institution evaluation of prognostic features.

Eihab Abdelfatah, Angela A Guzzetta, Neeraja Nagarajan, Christopher L Wolfgang, Timothy M Pawlik, Michael A Choti, Richard Schulick, Elizabeth A Montgomery, Christian Meyer, Katherine Thornton and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Histology-Tailored Approach to Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Carbon-ion radiotherapy for urological cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: a Current Review on Management.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eihab AbdelfatahDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Angela A GuzzettaDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Neeraja NagarajanDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Christopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael A ChotiDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Richard SchulickDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth A MontgomeryDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Christian MeyerDepartment of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Katherine ThorntonDepartment of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Joseph HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stephanie TerezakisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Deborah FrassicaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nita AhujaDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Clinical and Laboratory Research Training for Surgical OncologistsT32CA126607 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMERON, ANDREW M. · 2008 to 2024
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS T32 CA126607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetroperitoneal sarcomas are connective tissue tumors arising in the retroperitoneum. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. Debate has arisen over extent of resection, changes in histological classification/grading, and interest in incorporating radiotherapy. Therefore, we reviewed our institution's experience to evaluate prognostic factors.

methodsRetrospective chart review of all primary RPS patients at Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1994 to 2010. Histologic diagnosis and grading were re-evaluated with current criteria. Prognostic factors for survival, and recurrence were assessed.

resultsOne hundred thirty-one primary RPS patients met inclusion criteria. Median survival for patients who undergo en-bloc resection to negative margins (R0/R1) is 81.7 months. Surgical margins and grade were the most important factors for survival along with age, gender, presence of metastases and resection of ≥5 organs. Five-year survival for R0/R1 resection was 60%, similar to compartmental resection. Radiotherapy significantly decreased local recurrence (P = 0.026) on multivariate analysis. Grade in leiomyosarcomas and dedifferentiation in liposarcomas dictated patterns of local versus distal recurrence.

conclusionsEn bloc surgical resection to R0/R1 margins remains the cornerstone of therapy and provides comparable outcomes to compartmental resections. Grade remains important for prognosis, and histology dictates recurrence patterns. Radiotherapy appears promising for local control and warrants further investigation. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:56-64. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agentscompartmental resectiongradeleiomyosarcomaliposarcomaradiationsarcoma

Identifiers

PMID27076350
PMCPMC4917421
OpenAlexW2340570047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.