Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076295›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2016

Development of Experimental Vaccines Against Liver Flukes.

Huan Yong Yap, Peter M Smooker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huan Yong YapSchool of Applied Sciences, RMIT University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Peter M SmookerSchool of Applied Sciences, RMIT University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia. peter.smooker@rmit.edu.au.
RMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multitude of experimental vaccines have been developed against liver flukes in the past. However, there has yet to be the development of a commercial livestock vaccine. Reasons for this may be multiple, and include the lack of identification of the best antigen(s), or the immune response induced by those antigens not being appropriate in either magnitude or polarity (and therefore not protective). Cathepsin proteases are the major component of the excretory/secretory (ES) material of liver flukes in all stages of their life cycle in the definitive host and are the primary antigens of interest for the vaccine development in many studies. Hence, this chapter presents the methodologies of using cathepsin proteases as targeted antigens in recombinant protein and DNA vaccine development to engender protective immune responses against fasciolosis.First, the experimental vaccines developed in the past and the criteria of an effective vaccine for fasciolosis are briefly reviewed. Then flowcharts for recombinant protein vaccine and DNA vaccine development are presented, followed by the detailed materials and methodologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCathepsinsChlorocebus aethiopsCloning, MolecularComputational BiologyCOS CellsFasciola hepaticaFemaleGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsMaleMiceRatsVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticCathepsinsVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticCathepsinDNA vaccineFasciola hepaticaLiver flukesProtein vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27076295
OpenAlexW2502931912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.