Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27076273›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

A geometrical approach to control and controllability of nonlinear dynamical networks.

Le-Zhi Wang, Ri-Qi Su, Zi-Gang Huang, Xiao Wang, Wen-Xu Wang, Celso Grebogi, Ying-Cheng Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [State regulation for complex biological networks based on dynamic optimization algorithms].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Harnessing tipping points in complex ecological networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clarifying cognitive control and the controllable connectome.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Le-Zhi WangSchool of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, 650 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5706, USA.
Ri-Qi SuSchool of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, 650 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5706, USA.
Zi-Gang HuangSchool of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, 650 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5706, USA.
Xiao WangSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 621 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-9709, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4056-0155
Wen-Xu WangSchool of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, 650 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5706, USA.
Celso GrebogiInstitute for Complex Systems and Mathematical Biology, King's College, Meston Walk, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK.
Ying-Cheng LaiSchool of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, 650 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5706, USA.

Funding

Forward engineering to understand gene regulatory network topologiesR01GM106081 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI WANG, XIAO · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM106081NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of the recent interest and advances in linear controllability of complex networks, controlling nonlinear network dynamics remains an outstanding problem. Here we develop an experimentally feasible control framework for nonlinear dynamical networks that exhibit multistability. The control objective is to apply parameter perturbation to drive the system from one attractor to another, assuming that the former is undesired and the latter is desired. To make our framework practically meaningful, we consider restricted parameter perturbation by imposing two constraints: it must be experimentally realizable and applied only temporarily. We introduce the concept of attractor network, which allows us to formulate a quantifiable controllability framework for nonlinear dynamical networks: a network is more controllable if the attractor network is more strongly connected. We test our control framework using examples from various models of experimental gene regulatory networks and demonstrate the beneficial role of noise in facilitating control.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticNonlinear DynamicsCell SurvivalChemotactic FactorsComputer SimulationHumansProtein Interaction MappingSignal TransductionT-LymphocytesChemotactic Factors

Identifiers

PMID27076273
PMCPMC4834635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.