Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27075997›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

ACTN3 R577X and ACE I/D gene variants influence performance in elite sprinters: a multi-cohort study.

Ioannis D Papadimitriou, Alejandro Lucia, Yannis P Pitsiladis, Vladimir P Pushkarev, Dmitry A Dyatlov, Evgeniy F Orekhov, Guilherme G Artioli, João Paulo L F Guilherme, Antonio H Lancha, Valentina Ginevičienė and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Genes to predict VOBMC genomics · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Beyond VOGenes · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. TheSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Testing in Football: A Narrative Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Genes · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Genes · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Association of theGenes · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Ioannis D PapadimitriouInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Victoria, 8001, Australia.
Alejandro LuciaUniversidad Europea and Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Yannis P PitsiladisFIMS Reference Collaborating Centre of Sports Medicine for Anti-Doping Research, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Vladimir P PushkarevClinical Physiology Laboratory, Urals Research Centre for Radiation Medicine, Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Dmitry A DyatlovUral State University of Physical Culture, Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Evgeniy F OrekhovUral State University of Physical Culture, Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Guilherme G ArtioliSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
João Paulo L F GuilhermeSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio H LanchaSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Valentina GinevičienėDepartment of Human and Medical Genetics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Pawel CieszczykDepartment of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Agnieszka Maciejewska-KarlowskaDepartment of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Marek SawczukDepartment of Physical Culture and Health Promotion, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Carlos A MuniesaFaculty of Physical Activity, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Alcobendas, Spain.
Anastasia KouvatsiDepartment of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Myosotis MassiddaDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Carla Maria CalòDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Fleur GartonMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter J HouwelingMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Guan WangFIMS Reference Collaborating Centre of Sports Medicine for Anti-Doping Research, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Krista AustinFIMS Reference Collaborating Centre of Sports Medicine for Anti-Doping Research, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
Anastasiya M DruzhevskayaSports Genetics Laboratory, St Petersburg Research Institute of Physical Culture, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Irina V AstratenkovaDepartment of Physiology, St Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Ildus I AhmetovSport Technology Research Centre, Volga Region State Academy of Physical Culture, Sport and Tourism, Kazan, Russia.
David J BishopInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Victoria, 8001, Australia.
Kathryn N NorthMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Nir EynonInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Victoria, 8001, Australia. Nir.Eynon@vu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, studies investigating the association between ACTN3 R577X and ACE I/D gene variants and elite sprint/power performance have been limited by small cohorts from mixed sport disciplines, without quantitative measures of performance.

aimTo examine the association between these variants and sprint time in elite athletes.

methodsWe collected a total of 555 best personal 100-, 200-, and 400-m times of 346 elite sprinters in a large cohort of elite Caucasian or African origin sprinters from 10 different countries. Sprinters were genotyped for ACTN3 R577X and ACE ID variants.

resultsOn average, male Caucasian sprinters with the ACTN3 577RR or the ACE DD genotype had faster best 200-m sprint time than their 577XX (21.19 ± 0.53 s vs. 21.86 ± 0.54 s, p = 0.016) and ACE II (21.33 ± 0.56 vs. 21.93 ± 0.67 sec, p = 0.004) counterparts and only one case of ACE II, and no cases of ACTN3 577XX, had a faster 200-m time than the 2012 London Olympics qualifying (vs. 12 qualified sprinters with 577RR or 577RX genotype). Caucasian sprinters with the ACE DD genotype had faster best 400-m sprint time than their ACE II counterparts (46.94 ± 1.19 s vs. 48.50 ± 1.07 s, p = 0.003). Using genetic models we found that the ACTN3 577R allele and ACE D allele dominant model account for 0.92 % and 1.48 % of sprint time variance, respectively.

conclusionsDespite sprint performance relying on many gene variants and environment, the % sprint time variance explained by ACE and ACTN3 is substantial at the elite level and might be the difference between a world record and only making the final.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformanceRunningActininAllelesBlack PeopleCohort StudiesFemaleGenotypeHumansMalePeptidyl-Dipeptidase APolymorphism, GeneticWhite PeopleACE protein, humanActininACTN3 protein, humanPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AACEACTN3AthletesAthletic performanceExerciseGenomicsSprintα-actinin-3

Identifiers

PMID27075997
PMCPMC4831144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.