Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27075437›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

LDL-lowering therapy and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials and 36 observational studies.

Ping Tan, Shiyou Wei, Zhuang Tang, Liang Gao, Chen Zhang, Pan Nie, Lu Yang, Qiang Wei

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Association of Prediagnostic Statin Use with Aggressive Prostate Cancer from the Multiethnic Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The tangled web of dyslipidemia and cancer: Is there any association?Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, and Cancer Risk.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping TanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Shiyou WeiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Zhuang TangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Liang GaoDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chen ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Pan NieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Lu YangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of statins in preventing prostate cancer is currently a controversial issue. The aim of this review is to investigate the effects of statins use on prostate cancer risk. Electronic databases (the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched systematically up to April, 2015. Weighted averages were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistic heterogeneity scores were assessed with the standard Cochran's Q test and I(2) statistic. The pooled estimates of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies suggest that statins have a neutral effect on total prostate cancer (RR = 1·02, 95% CI: 0·90-1·14; and RR = 0·91, 95% CI: 0·79-1·02, respectively). This research provides no evidence to suggest that the use of statins for cholesterol lowering is beneficial for the prevention of low-grade or localized prostate cancer, although a plausible association between statins use and the reduction risk of advanced (RR = 0·87, 95% CI: 0·82-0·91) or high-grade prostate cancer (RR = 0·83, 95% CI: 0·66-0·99) is observed. Furthermore, it shows that prostate cancer risk does not statistically significant benefit from long-term statins use.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsBiostatisticsHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAnticholesteremic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27075437
PMCPMC4830970
OpenAlexW2339488754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.